Effect of brushing on surface roughness, fluoride release, and biofilm formation with different tooth-colored materials

Background/purpose: Tooth brushing, material mechanical ageing procedure, is the most effective way in removing biofilm. The purpose of this study was to investigate the surface roughness, fluoride-release, and S. mutans biofilm formation on various tooth-colored restorative materials before and aft...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Komalsingsakul A.
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/84484
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.84484
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.844842023-06-19T00:06:38Z Effect of brushing on surface roughness, fluoride release, and biofilm formation with different tooth-colored materials Komalsingsakul A. Mahidol University Dentistry Background/purpose: Tooth brushing, material mechanical ageing procedure, is the most effective way in removing biofilm. The purpose of this study was to investigate the surface roughness, fluoride-release, and S. mutans biofilm formation on various tooth-colored restorative materials before and after brushing. Materials and methods: Discs of materials, a nanocomposite (Filtek Z350XT; CO), a giomer (Beautifil II; GIOMER), a resin-modified glass-ionomer material (Fuji II LC; RMGI), and a conventional glass-ionomer material (Fuji IX GP Extra; GI), were prepared, polished with abrasive discs (SofLex), and divided into brushed and not brushed groups. The surface roughness of specimens was observed using a contact profilometer, fluoride-release was measured using a fluoride-specific ion electrode, and S. mutans biofilm formation, biovolume and live/dead cells, was observed under a confocal laser scanning microscope. Results: Higher roughness was observed on GI and RMGI than on CO and GIOMER. Brushing had no effect on the roughness. The fluoride-release of GI and RMGI was higher than that of GIOMER. The fluoride-release decreased after brushing in all materials. The biovolume of S. mutans was not significantly different between GIOMER, RMGI and GI, while CO showed the highest. Brushing resulted in a higher biovolume for all materials, except CO, which showed no change. After brushing, all the tested materials demonstrated identical biovolumes. There were no significant differences in live/dead cells among all groups. Conclusion: Brushing demonstrated a negative effect on the fluoride-release and biovolume of S. mutans biofilms for all tested materials except nanocomposites. 2023-06-18T17:06:38Z 2023-06-18T17:06:38Z 2022-01-01 Article Journal of Dental Sciences Vol.17 No.1 (2022) , 389-398 10.1016/j.jds.2021.08.013 22138862 19917902 2-s2.0-85114183236 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/84484 SCOPUS
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Dentistry
spellingShingle Dentistry
Komalsingsakul A.
Effect of brushing on surface roughness, fluoride release, and biofilm formation with different tooth-colored materials
description Background/purpose: Tooth brushing, material mechanical ageing procedure, is the most effective way in removing biofilm. The purpose of this study was to investigate the surface roughness, fluoride-release, and S. mutans biofilm formation on various tooth-colored restorative materials before and after brushing. Materials and methods: Discs of materials, a nanocomposite (Filtek Z350XT; CO), a giomer (Beautifil II; GIOMER), a resin-modified glass-ionomer material (Fuji II LC; RMGI), and a conventional glass-ionomer material (Fuji IX GP Extra; GI), were prepared, polished with abrasive discs (SofLex), and divided into brushed and not brushed groups. The surface roughness of specimens was observed using a contact profilometer, fluoride-release was measured using a fluoride-specific ion electrode, and S. mutans biofilm formation, biovolume and live/dead cells, was observed under a confocal laser scanning microscope. Results: Higher roughness was observed on GI and RMGI than on CO and GIOMER. Brushing had no effect on the roughness. The fluoride-release of GI and RMGI was higher than that of GIOMER. The fluoride-release decreased after brushing in all materials. The biovolume of S. mutans was not significantly different between GIOMER, RMGI and GI, while CO showed the highest. Brushing resulted in a higher biovolume for all materials, except CO, which showed no change. After brushing, all the tested materials demonstrated identical biovolumes. There were no significant differences in live/dead cells among all groups. Conclusion: Brushing demonstrated a negative effect on the fluoride-release and biovolume of S. mutans biofilms for all tested materials except nanocomposites.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Komalsingsakul A.
format Article
author Komalsingsakul A.
author_sort Komalsingsakul A.
title Effect of brushing on surface roughness, fluoride release, and biofilm formation with different tooth-colored materials
title_short Effect of brushing on surface roughness, fluoride release, and biofilm formation with different tooth-colored materials
title_full Effect of brushing on surface roughness, fluoride release, and biofilm formation with different tooth-colored materials
title_fullStr Effect of brushing on surface roughness, fluoride release, and biofilm formation with different tooth-colored materials
title_full_unstemmed Effect of brushing on surface roughness, fluoride release, and biofilm formation with different tooth-colored materials
title_sort effect of brushing on surface roughness, fluoride release, and biofilm formation with different tooth-colored materials
publishDate 2023
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/84484
_version_ 1781414294806593536