APPLICATION OF LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS (LCCA) IN SELECTING ALTERNATIVE PROGRAMS TO REDUCE DERATING (CASE STUDY OF PLTU NAGAN RAYA)
PLTU Nagan Raya is a steam power plant with 2 x 110 MW installed capacity located in Aceh. As the biggest power plant in Aceh, PLTU Nagan Raya also have important role in Sumatera Utara electricity system. Recently, within derating condition, PLTU Nagan Raya requires improvement to maintain its...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/44173 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | PLTU Nagan Raya is a steam power plant with 2 x 110 MW installed capacity
located in Aceh. As the biggest power plant in Aceh, PLTU Nagan Raya also have
important role in Sumatera Utara electricity system. Recently, within derating
condition, PLTU Nagan Raya requires improvement to maintain its optimal
performance. The purpose of this study is to perform an economic analysis toward
derating and forced outage’s improvement programs by applying life cycle cost
analysis (LCCA).
In this research, the first approach is collecting forced outage historical data to
recognise the equipments’ main problems. By using pareto loss output (PLO)
diagram, it is known that unit 2 have greater outage which dominating by boiler
tube leaks and refractory problems. The improvement programs grouped into three
alternatives, then the data (forced outage hours) are processing within Reliasoft
Weibull++ 6
th
version’s software and Monte Carlo simulation. Its outputs are
calculated into the form of nett present value (NPV), total cost / benefit vs risk, and
also performance indicators which are equivalent availability factor (EAF),
equivalent forced outage rate (EFOR) and nett capacity factor (NCF) of each
alternative program.
Result of the research was found that alternative 3 (boiler pipe coating and
refractory material’s modification) became a more effective choice. Alternative 3
has the largest nett present value (NPV), the lowest level of cost / benefit vs risk
and cost of energy (CoE). In terms of performance, alternative 3 is a better choice
with 81,23 % of EAF, EFOR of 20,89 % and electricity production ratio’s
enhancement within 78 % of NCF.
|
---|