PROJECT COST OVERRUN ANALYSIS CASE STUDY: A ROTATING EQUIPMENT SERVICES COMPANY (PT Z)
PT Z is a multinational company based in one of the cities in West Java dealing with rotating equipment services. The company has a profitability issue due to the cost overrun of the projects they executed. The total cost overrun in 2020 is about 21.6 billion Rupiahs that was contributed from 3 (t...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/57409 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | PT Z is a multinational company based in one of the cities in West Java dealing with rotating equipment
services. The company has a profitability issue due to the cost overrun of the projects they executed.
The total cost overrun in 2020 is about 21.6 billion Rupiahs that was contributed from 3 (three) business
units; BU1, BU2, and BU3. The biggest contributor is coming from BU1 that contributes 12 billion
Rupiahs cost overrun due to overbudget on manhours.
The company has been trying to reduce or minimize this cost overrun issue, however, the actions taken
might not effective enough to address it. This study discusses what factors that cause the cost overrun
at the company, investigation of the root cause(s), the alternative solutions that may be applicable, and
the implementation of the selected alternative solutions.
The root cause analysis used the current reality tree (CRT) and found 3 main root causes that cause the
cost overrun. Those are project management implementation, project cost estimation review, and
management of the tools for service activities. The alternative solutions of each root cause were
established, and then the best alternative solutions were selected using the analytic hierarchy process
(AHP). The biggest criteria for the selection of the alternative is the time, how immediate the solution
can provide the impact to the cost overrun reduction. The selected alternative solutions are improvement
on project management implementation, project cost estimation review process, and better management
of the tools for service activities as part of implementation of total productive maintenance (TPM).
Selected alternative solutions have been initiated by the company such as the internal initiative to
improve project management implementation by involving the internal expert in organization, hiring
dedicated people to manage the shop tools, and make some changes in cost estimation review process
flow. Even though the result of implementation may not be measured and obtained in short period, the
improvement to have at least 18% cost overrun reduction can be gained in following year (2021). |
---|