COURIER RATING VIABILITY ON ONLINE FOOD DELIVERY PLATFORMS: A CASE ON GOFOOD USERS IN BANDUNG.
GoFood is now Indonesia's most popular online food delivery (OFD) application. However, due to rising competition and growing consumer awareness in the country's OFD market, many businesses frequently rely on customer rating surveys to get feedback on how their service personnels perfor...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/66772 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | GoFood is now Indonesia's most popular online food delivery (OFD) application.
However, due to rising competition and growing consumer awareness in the country's
OFD market, many businesses frequently rely on customer rating surveys to get
feedback on how their service personnels performs. However, the ratings obtained by
GoFood was either a 5-star or was left unrated by users, limiting their ability to identify
and resolve any service deficiencies. Considering that Gojek’s transaction-based star
rating system does not allow other users to see ratings given by other users, this paper
takes an exploratory mixed methods approach to focus on; firstly, exploring the reasons
why users give and not give star ratings when such rating will not be visible for other
users; secondly, determining whether Gojek should retain or eliminate its rating
systems; and lastly, propose recommendations for the company to ensure that it keeps
its users satisfied. After interviewing 21 GoFood users in Bandung, it was found
through inductive thematic analysis users give ratings to express disappointing or
amazing experiences, were triggered by reminders, affected by personal circumstances
and to show appreciation or empathy towards the driver. Alternatively, users do not give
ratings due to the absence of a notable experience, no spare time, forgetfulness, laziness,
unwillingness to express disappointing experience and because there is no benefit for
raters. These findings were utilized to design the quantitative research instrument,
which obtained 209 responses from GoFood users in Bandung with notable findings
that more than half of 5-star raters gave such ratings due to empathy and that there is a
correlation between feeling forced to give ratings and the disturbance that comes from
GoFood’s pop-up rating box. Moreover, forgetfulness and laziness become the top two
most frequently chosen reasons for skipping ratings. Consequently, Gojek’s rating
system should be retained with limitations and purposes, considering that over half of
5-star raters gave such ratings not due to the driver’s actual performance but due to
empathy. Nonetheless, without it, the company will struggle to ensure that drivers
continue to deliver the same level of service. In fact, this rating system can be kept as
the most convenient method to collect negative feedback that will be insightful for the
company. Besides this, in order to keep its users satisfied, Gojek can also attempt to
introduce an incentive program, allow users to give tips only or introduce the
anonymous rater feature. However, considering the complexity of Gojek’s services and
operations, further studies must be conducted before anything else. |
---|