VIBRATION ANALYSIS METHOD TO DIAGNOSE DEFECTS OF ROTATING MACHINE WITH MACHINE LEARNING APPROACH
The application of industry 4.0 is currently being intensively developed. One component that is widely discussed and studied is predictive maintenance. This method is proven to reduce maintance costs and decrease the losses due to sudden termination to production process. There are several kind o...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/70664 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | The application of industry 4.0 is currently being intensively developed. One
component that is widely discussed and studied is predictive maintenance. This
method is proven to reduce maintance costs and decrease the losses due to sudden
termination to production process. There are several kind of predictive
maintenance techniques, one of them is vibration analysis. This technique is usually
used to diagnose the condition of a rotating machine and determine the location of
damage.
Some kind of vibration analysis methods have been developed, there are time
domain analysis, wavelet coefficient analysis, and frequency spectrum analysis.
Time domain analysis and wavelet coefficient analysis are now being pretty much
developed. However, they are still having some weaknesses and less effective to use
in practical application. Another method that has been being widely used is
frequency spectrum analysis. Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) is an algorithm that is
used to decompose the frequencies in a vibration signal. Nevertheless, this
algorithm has some weaknesses in case of machine learning classification, they are
spectral leakage and frequency shifting due to measurement error. Spectral leakage
makes the amplitude of a frequency lower than the real value and frequency shifting
leads to error in reading of amplitude in feature extraction. Therefore, in this paper
the vibration analysis is conducted with same perspective with classic frequency
spectrum analysis, but it is done with little bit different approach. Generally, the
process is divided into filtering in certain frequency of fundamental frequency and
the harmonics. Next, Root Mean Square (RMS) is calculated for each filtered signal
and it is normalized to get approximation amplitude of the fundamental frequency
and harmoncis. This method is then named as FiltRA (Filtering and RMS
Approximation). The values obtained from that method are used for process in
machine learning.
Vibration analysis conducted in this paper was divided into two parts, that are low
frequency analysis and high frequency analysis. In low frequency analysis, the
defects observed were unbalance, misalignment, and looseness. Then, in high
frequency analysis, the observed defects were outer race, inner race, roller, and
cage defect in a bearing. This separation was done because in many cases of high
iv
frequency defect, the amplitude of high frequency defect is disappeared because it
is too small if compared with amplitude of low frequency defect. Therefore, by
applying this division, it is expected that the defect in low and high frequency can
be detected clearly.
In classification process, low frequency analysis provided output with dominant
defect while high frequency analysis could provide defects that appeared together.
This thing could be conducted because in high frequency analysis, the defect
frequency appeared in different value. But, in low frequency, the frequencies used
were same, so it was hard to extract the defects appeared together. There were
three different algorithms used, they were Multi Level Perceptron (MLP), KNearest
Neighbor (KNN), and Random Forest (RF). After training and validation
process, it was gained that RF algorithm had the best performance with 99,66%
accuracy and 0,044 ms computational time to predict a vibration datum with defect
in low frequency domain. Same result was obtained in analysis of bearing defect. It
showed 100% accuracy for RF algorithm and 0,052 ms computational time.
However, in bearing defect detection, all classification algorithms can generate
100% accuracy because the difference between the defects and normal condition
was clearly separated. |
---|