VENDOR SELECTION FOR SAEJIVA

The Indonesian perfume industry is projected to grow significantly with an annual growth rate of 2.73% from 2024 to 2028. Meanwhile, the global natural fragrance market is growing faster than synthetic fragrances, with a CAGR of over 9% from 2023 to 2032. However, extracting essential oils is more e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pijar Zaman, Aldien
Format: Final Project
Language:Indonesia
Online Access:https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/83668
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung
Language: Indonesia
id id-itb.:83668
spelling id-itb.:836682024-08-12T14:03:51ZVENDOR SELECTION FOR SAEJIVA Pijar Zaman, Aldien Indonesia Final Project perfume company, vendor selection, analytics hierarchy process INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/83668 The Indonesian perfume industry is projected to grow significantly with an annual growth rate of 2.73% from 2024 to 2028. Meanwhile, the global natural fragrance market is growing faster than synthetic fragrances, with a CAGR of over 9% from 2023 to 2032. However, extracting essential oils is more expensive than producing synthetic perfumes due to the need for large-scale machinery and skilled labour. Companies can overcome capacity limitations by outsourcing to external vendors. Saejiva, a natural fragrance brand, faces challenges in vendor selection, experiencing issues with inefficiency, delays, and poor product quality from previous vendors, has the effect of reducing potential profits and necessitating a reevaluation of their vendor choices. This study uses the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to help Saejiva select a new vendor by prioritizing criteria that meet the company's requirements and recommending the best vendor. Data was collected through literature reviews to identify relevant criteria, Focus Group Discussions (FGD) to find essential criteria for the company, and AHP questionnaires. Saejiva's C-level executives acted as experts in the FGDs and AHP questionnaires to determine criteria priorities and vendor alternatives. The results showed the importance levels of criteria as follows: capability (0.3668), quality (0.1848), cost (0.1382), service (0.1068), capacity (0.0654), delivery (0.0606), warranty (0.0525), and performance history (0.0249). The importance levels of vendor alternatives were SKI (0.4539), AVF (0.3236), and SHB (0.2225). Thus, the best vendor recommended for Saejiva is SKI as the next vendor. text
institution Institut Teknologi Bandung
building Institut Teknologi Bandung Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider Institut Teknologi Bandung
collection Digital ITB
language Indonesia
description The Indonesian perfume industry is projected to grow significantly with an annual growth rate of 2.73% from 2024 to 2028. Meanwhile, the global natural fragrance market is growing faster than synthetic fragrances, with a CAGR of over 9% from 2023 to 2032. However, extracting essential oils is more expensive than producing synthetic perfumes due to the need for large-scale machinery and skilled labour. Companies can overcome capacity limitations by outsourcing to external vendors. Saejiva, a natural fragrance brand, faces challenges in vendor selection, experiencing issues with inefficiency, delays, and poor product quality from previous vendors, has the effect of reducing potential profits and necessitating a reevaluation of their vendor choices. This study uses the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to help Saejiva select a new vendor by prioritizing criteria that meet the company's requirements and recommending the best vendor. Data was collected through literature reviews to identify relevant criteria, Focus Group Discussions (FGD) to find essential criteria for the company, and AHP questionnaires. Saejiva's C-level executives acted as experts in the FGDs and AHP questionnaires to determine criteria priorities and vendor alternatives. The results showed the importance levels of criteria as follows: capability (0.3668), quality (0.1848), cost (0.1382), service (0.1068), capacity (0.0654), delivery (0.0606), warranty (0.0525), and performance history (0.0249). The importance levels of vendor alternatives were SKI (0.4539), AVF (0.3236), and SHB (0.2225). Thus, the best vendor recommended for Saejiva is SKI as the next vendor.
format Final Project
author Pijar Zaman, Aldien
spellingShingle Pijar Zaman, Aldien
VENDOR SELECTION FOR SAEJIVA
author_facet Pijar Zaman, Aldien
author_sort Pijar Zaman, Aldien
title VENDOR SELECTION FOR SAEJIVA
title_short VENDOR SELECTION FOR SAEJIVA
title_full VENDOR SELECTION FOR SAEJIVA
title_fullStr VENDOR SELECTION FOR SAEJIVA
title_full_unstemmed VENDOR SELECTION FOR SAEJIVA
title_sort vendor selection for saejiva
url https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/83668
_version_ 1822282594940616704