PENGARUH PEER ASSESSMENT DALAM MENINGKATKAN KETERAMPILAN ANAMNESIS DI SKILLS LABORATORY
Background. Peer assessment is new innovation in assessment method where students assess students. The benefits of peer assessment are feedback, cognitive and metacognitve gain, motivation, collaborative learning, self-regulated learning and enhance performance. Learning in skills laboratory, studen...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
| Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/90559/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=52945 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| Summary: | Background. Peer assessment is new innovation in assessment method
where students assess students. The benefits of peer assessment are
feedback, cognitive and metacognitve gain, motivation, collaborative
learning, self-regulated learning and enhance performance. Learning in
skills laboratory, students must master not only knowledge but also skills.
Peer assessment is expected to make students be more motivate in
learning and enhance performance.
Objective. The aim of this study is to find out whether peer assessment
can enhance students� clinical skills in skills laboratory.
Method. This is a quasi-experiment study with matching-only pretest
posttest control group design. The subject is all third year students in
Medical School of Tadulako University which is divided in experiment
group and control group. Before giving treatment, the skills of students in
all group will be assess (pre test). Post test will be held after the treatment.
Students in experiment group will have focus group discussion about the
benefits of peer assessment. The raising score from pre test to post test
will be analized with student t test.
Results. P value for raising score is 0,907 (α > 0,05) with mean difference
-0,091, which means not signifance statistically. The negative number of
mean difference indicate that the raising score in experiment group is
lower than in control group.
Conclusion. Raising score in control group is higher than in experiment
group, but not significance statistically. Application of peer assessment in
skills laboratory should be more concern in students ability in assessing
which can be obtain by intense training and continous monitoring and
feedback from instructor. |
|---|