Implicit theories of intelligence, self-regulation of learning, academic delay of gratification and mathematics achievement of Filipino college freshmen by Amalia E. Roldan.

The main purpose of the study is to test a model describing that individual’s implicit theories of intelligence (entity or incremental) influences their preference of using self-regulation of learning (SRL) and academic delay of gratification to improve their mathematics achievement. A preliminary...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Roldan, Amalia E.
Format: text
Published: Animo Repository 2014
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_doctoral/1352
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_doctoral-2353
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_doctoral-23532021-06-07T08:00:04Z Implicit theories of intelligence, self-regulation of learning, academic delay of gratification and mathematics achievement of Filipino college freshmen by Amalia E. Roldan. Roldan, Amalia E. The main purpose of the study is to test a model describing that individual’s implicit theories of intelligence (entity or incremental) influences their preference of using self-regulation of learning (SRL) and academic delay of gratification to improve their mathematics achievement. A preliminary analysis was first conducted to confirm if self-regulation of learning and academic delay of gratification was the same learning strategy or not. Two measurement models were tested: Model 1 is a one factor model (χ2= 220.43 df= 44 χ2/df = 5.10 RMR = .031 RMSEA=.098 GFI=.92 AGFI=.88 NFI = .92 IFI=.93 TLI=.95 CFI=.93) and Model 2, a two- factor model (χ2 = 95.826 df= 43 χ2/df = 2.29 RMR = .024 RMSEA=.054 GFI =.96 AGFI=.95 NFI = .96, RFI=.95, IFI=.98, TLI=.97, CFI=.98).Confirmatory Factor Analysis fit indices showed that Model 2 (Two-factor model) has better fit and that SRL and ADOG are different constructs of learning strategy. This result decides to include both the SRL and ADOG in the hypothesized model. Using Path analysis, the model was partially supported. Combining the direct and indirect effects of the predictors (incremental and entity theories of intelligence, SRL and ADOG) of mathematics achievement among college freshmen showed that incremental theory of intelligence contributes the largest effect. The theoretical and educational implications of the findings are discussed. 2014-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_doctoral/1352 Dissertations Animo Repository
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
description The main purpose of the study is to test a model describing that individual’s implicit theories of intelligence (entity or incremental) influences their preference of using self-regulation of learning (SRL) and academic delay of gratification to improve their mathematics achievement. A preliminary analysis was first conducted to confirm if self-regulation of learning and academic delay of gratification was the same learning strategy or not. Two measurement models were tested: Model 1 is a one factor model (χ2= 220.43 df= 44 χ2/df = 5.10 RMR = .031 RMSEA=.098 GFI=.92 AGFI=.88 NFI = .92 IFI=.93 TLI=.95 CFI=.93) and Model 2, a two- factor model (χ2 = 95.826 df= 43 χ2/df = 2.29 RMR = .024 RMSEA=.054 GFI =.96 AGFI=.95 NFI = .96, RFI=.95, IFI=.98, TLI=.97, CFI=.98).Confirmatory Factor Analysis fit indices showed that Model 2 (Two-factor model) has better fit and that SRL and ADOG are different constructs of learning strategy. This result decides to include both the SRL and ADOG in the hypothesized model. Using Path analysis, the model was partially supported. Combining the direct and indirect effects of the predictors (incremental and entity theories of intelligence, SRL and ADOG) of mathematics achievement among college freshmen showed that incremental theory of intelligence contributes the largest effect. The theoretical and educational implications of the findings are discussed.
format text
author Roldan, Amalia E.
spellingShingle Roldan, Amalia E.
Implicit theories of intelligence, self-regulation of learning, academic delay of gratification and mathematics achievement of Filipino college freshmen by Amalia E. Roldan.
author_facet Roldan, Amalia E.
author_sort Roldan, Amalia E.
title Implicit theories of intelligence, self-regulation of learning, academic delay of gratification and mathematics achievement of Filipino college freshmen by Amalia E. Roldan.
title_short Implicit theories of intelligence, self-regulation of learning, academic delay of gratification and mathematics achievement of Filipino college freshmen by Amalia E. Roldan.
title_full Implicit theories of intelligence, self-regulation of learning, academic delay of gratification and mathematics achievement of Filipino college freshmen by Amalia E. Roldan.
title_fullStr Implicit theories of intelligence, self-regulation of learning, academic delay of gratification and mathematics achievement of Filipino college freshmen by Amalia E. Roldan.
title_full_unstemmed Implicit theories of intelligence, self-regulation of learning, academic delay of gratification and mathematics achievement of Filipino college freshmen by Amalia E. Roldan.
title_sort implicit theories of intelligence, self-regulation of learning, academic delay of gratification and mathematics achievement of filipino college freshmen by amalia e. roldan.
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2014
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_doctoral/1352
_version_ 1800919414594338816