Development, validation, and efficacy of using 5E and 4A learning modules on nuclear reactions

Current Philippine education stresses change in science. The focus of any change should be on improving student achievement. In attempt to address this concern, development and validation of learning modules anchored in 5E and 4A learning models were established. This action research sought to answe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Relativo, Joyce C.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Animo Repository 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/7186
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
Language: English
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_masteral-14376
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_masteral-143762025-03-06T02:01:29Z Development, validation, and efficacy of using 5E and 4A learning modules on nuclear reactions Relativo, Joyce C. Current Philippine education stresses change in science. The focus of any change should be on improving student achievement. In attempt to address this concern, development and validation of learning modules anchored in 5E and 4A learning models were established. This action research sought to answer the students’ prior knowledge, views, and understanding before and after using the learning modules developed by the researcher. The study used both quantitative and qualitative method. The quantitative aspect utilized if there is a change or improvement in students’ understanding on nuclear reactions. For qualitative aspect of the study, students’ views about the learning modules were identified based on their responses from the Students’ Journal Logs (SJL) and Focus Group Discussion (FGD). After the implementation for two weeks, it was found that utilizing 5E learning module increased more the students’ understanding on nuclear reactions. Going through the 5E learning module which has 5 phases: Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, and Evaluate compare to 4A learning module utilized which has 4 phases: Activity, Analysis, Abstraction and Application, in this action research, 5E learning module has provided more activities (20 activities), compared to the 4A learning module which has only, 14 activities included in the module. 7 activities difference from the. Based from the qualitative data gathered it has been identified that internet-based activity hindered students’ understanding. 2019-08-19T07:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/7186 Master's Theses English Animo Repository Nuclear reactions Science--Study and teaching Chemistry
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
language English
topic Nuclear reactions
Science--Study and teaching
Chemistry
spellingShingle Nuclear reactions
Science--Study and teaching
Chemistry
Relativo, Joyce C.
Development, validation, and efficacy of using 5E and 4A learning modules on nuclear reactions
description Current Philippine education stresses change in science. The focus of any change should be on improving student achievement. In attempt to address this concern, development and validation of learning modules anchored in 5E and 4A learning models were established. This action research sought to answer the students’ prior knowledge, views, and understanding before and after using the learning modules developed by the researcher. The study used both quantitative and qualitative method. The quantitative aspect utilized if there is a change or improvement in students’ understanding on nuclear reactions. For qualitative aspect of the study, students’ views about the learning modules were identified based on their responses from the Students’ Journal Logs (SJL) and Focus Group Discussion (FGD). After the implementation for two weeks, it was found that utilizing 5E learning module increased more the students’ understanding on nuclear reactions. Going through the 5E learning module which has 5 phases: Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, and Evaluate compare to 4A learning module utilized which has 4 phases: Activity, Analysis, Abstraction and Application, in this action research, 5E learning module has provided more activities (20 activities), compared to the 4A learning module which has only, 14 activities included in the module. 7 activities difference from the. Based from the qualitative data gathered it has been identified that internet-based activity hindered students’ understanding.
format text
author Relativo, Joyce C.
author_facet Relativo, Joyce C.
author_sort Relativo, Joyce C.
title Development, validation, and efficacy of using 5E and 4A learning modules on nuclear reactions
title_short Development, validation, and efficacy of using 5E and 4A learning modules on nuclear reactions
title_full Development, validation, and efficacy of using 5E and 4A learning modules on nuclear reactions
title_fullStr Development, validation, and efficacy of using 5E and 4A learning modules on nuclear reactions
title_full_unstemmed Development, validation, and efficacy of using 5E and 4A learning modules on nuclear reactions
title_sort development, validation, and efficacy of using 5e and 4a learning modules on nuclear reactions
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2019
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/7186
_version_ 1826361319939375104