The rationalization of cyanate ester die attach adhesives for hermetic packages

Two cyanate ester adhesives from different manufacturers were compared in terms of rheology, cure kinetics, and manufacturability. This was done inline with possible source and risk diversification, as well as, for continuous improvement of the current adhesive die attach process. Both materials wer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tirol, D.J. Rean D.
Format: text
Published: Animo Repository 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/13345
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-13824
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-138242024-11-10T23:58:06Z The rationalization of cyanate ester die attach adhesives for hermetic packages Tirol, D.J. Rean D. Two cyanate ester adhesives from different manufacturers were compared in terms of rheology, cure kinetics, and manufacturability. This was done inline with possible source and risk diversification, as well as, for continuous improvement of the current adhesive die attach process. Both materials were subjected to differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetry (TGA), and rheology evaluations. Die attach quality and reliability data, such as stud pull, voiding, bond line thickness, and die tilting were also gathered. Results show that adhesive B changed less in viscosity and thixotropic index after 10 hours. DSC shows an extra peak attributed to a polymer additive included to minimize resin bleed. Less voiding, resin bleed, and degree of tailing were observed for the new adhesive. TGA results show same behavior of both materials in the soak and cure temperatures of the curing profile. Bond line thickness and die tilt are comparable. Stud pull strength is lower for the adhesive B but still within specs. Electrical results show no significant difference between both adhesives. The adhesive B shows promise as an adhesive for the adhesive attach process. However, stud pull strength still has to be improved. Changes in the new material's viscosity can serve as targets for Adhesive A's improvement. High volume evaluation and qualification is recommended when convenient. 2009-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/13345 Faculty Research Work Animo Repository Adhesives—Testing Cyanates Packaging Engineering Physics Physical Sciences and Mathematics Physics
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
topic Adhesives—Testing
Cyanates
Packaging
Engineering Physics
Physical Sciences and Mathematics
Physics
spellingShingle Adhesives—Testing
Cyanates
Packaging
Engineering Physics
Physical Sciences and Mathematics
Physics
Tirol, D.J. Rean D.
The rationalization of cyanate ester die attach adhesives for hermetic packages
description Two cyanate ester adhesives from different manufacturers were compared in terms of rheology, cure kinetics, and manufacturability. This was done inline with possible source and risk diversification, as well as, for continuous improvement of the current adhesive die attach process. Both materials were subjected to differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetry (TGA), and rheology evaluations. Die attach quality and reliability data, such as stud pull, voiding, bond line thickness, and die tilting were also gathered. Results show that adhesive B changed less in viscosity and thixotropic index after 10 hours. DSC shows an extra peak attributed to a polymer additive included to minimize resin bleed. Less voiding, resin bleed, and degree of tailing were observed for the new adhesive. TGA results show same behavior of both materials in the soak and cure temperatures of the curing profile. Bond line thickness and die tilt are comparable. Stud pull strength is lower for the adhesive B but still within specs. Electrical results show no significant difference between both adhesives. The adhesive B shows promise as an adhesive for the adhesive attach process. However, stud pull strength still has to be improved. Changes in the new material's viscosity can serve as targets for Adhesive A's improvement. High volume evaluation and qualification is recommended when convenient.
format text
author Tirol, D.J. Rean D.
author_facet Tirol, D.J. Rean D.
author_sort Tirol, D.J. Rean D.
title The rationalization of cyanate ester die attach adhesives for hermetic packages
title_short The rationalization of cyanate ester die attach adhesives for hermetic packages
title_full The rationalization of cyanate ester die attach adhesives for hermetic packages
title_fullStr The rationalization of cyanate ester die attach adhesives for hermetic packages
title_full_unstemmed The rationalization of cyanate ester die attach adhesives for hermetic packages
title_sort rationalization of cyanate ester die attach adhesives for hermetic packages
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2009
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/13345
_version_ 1816861306246922240