The rationalization of cyanate ester die attach adhesives for hermetic packages
Two cyanate ester adhesives from different manufacturers were compared in terms of rheology, cure kinetics, and manufacturability. This was done inline with possible source and risk diversification, as well as, for continuous improvement of the current adhesive die attach process. Both materials wer...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Published: |
Animo Repository
2009
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/13345 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | De La Salle University |
id |
oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-13824 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-138242024-11-10T23:58:06Z The rationalization of cyanate ester die attach adhesives for hermetic packages Tirol, D.J. Rean D. Two cyanate ester adhesives from different manufacturers were compared in terms of rheology, cure kinetics, and manufacturability. This was done inline with possible source and risk diversification, as well as, for continuous improvement of the current adhesive die attach process. Both materials were subjected to differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetry (TGA), and rheology evaluations. Die attach quality and reliability data, such as stud pull, voiding, bond line thickness, and die tilting were also gathered. Results show that adhesive B changed less in viscosity and thixotropic index after 10 hours. DSC shows an extra peak attributed to a polymer additive included to minimize resin bleed. Less voiding, resin bleed, and degree of tailing were observed for the new adhesive. TGA results show same behavior of both materials in the soak and cure temperatures of the curing profile. Bond line thickness and die tilt are comparable. Stud pull strength is lower for the adhesive B but still within specs. Electrical results show no significant difference between both adhesives. The adhesive B shows promise as an adhesive for the adhesive attach process. However, stud pull strength still has to be improved. Changes in the new material's viscosity can serve as targets for Adhesive A's improvement. High volume evaluation and qualification is recommended when convenient. 2009-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/13345 Faculty Research Work Animo Repository Adhesives—Testing Cyanates Packaging Engineering Physics Physical Sciences and Mathematics Physics |
institution |
De La Salle University |
building |
De La Salle University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Philippines Philippines |
content_provider |
De La Salle University Library |
collection |
DLSU Institutional Repository |
topic |
Adhesives—Testing Cyanates Packaging Engineering Physics Physical Sciences and Mathematics Physics |
spellingShingle |
Adhesives—Testing Cyanates Packaging Engineering Physics Physical Sciences and Mathematics Physics Tirol, D.J. Rean D. The rationalization of cyanate ester die attach adhesives for hermetic packages |
description |
Two cyanate ester adhesives from different manufacturers were compared in terms of rheology, cure kinetics, and manufacturability. This was done inline with possible source and risk diversification, as well as, for continuous improvement of the current adhesive die attach process. Both materials were subjected to differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetry (TGA), and rheology evaluations. Die attach quality and reliability data, such as stud pull, voiding, bond line thickness, and die tilting were also gathered. Results show that adhesive B changed less in viscosity and thixotropic index after 10 hours. DSC shows an extra peak attributed to a polymer additive included to minimize resin bleed. Less voiding, resin bleed, and degree of tailing were observed for the new adhesive. TGA results show same behavior of both materials in the soak and cure temperatures of the curing profile. Bond line thickness and die tilt are comparable. Stud pull strength is lower for the adhesive B but still within specs. Electrical results show no significant difference between both adhesives. The adhesive B shows promise as an adhesive for the adhesive attach process. However, stud pull strength still has to be improved. Changes in the new material's viscosity can serve as targets for Adhesive A's improvement. High volume evaluation and qualification is recommended when convenient. |
format |
text |
author |
Tirol, D.J. Rean D. |
author_facet |
Tirol, D.J. Rean D. |
author_sort |
Tirol, D.J. Rean D. |
title |
The rationalization of cyanate ester die attach adhesives for hermetic packages |
title_short |
The rationalization of cyanate ester die attach adhesives for hermetic packages |
title_full |
The rationalization of cyanate ester die attach adhesives for hermetic packages |
title_fullStr |
The rationalization of cyanate ester die attach adhesives for hermetic packages |
title_full_unstemmed |
The rationalization of cyanate ester die attach adhesives for hermetic packages |
title_sort |
rationalization of cyanate ester die attach adhesives for hermetic packages |
publisher |
Animo Repository |
publishDate |
2009 |
url |
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/13345 |
_version_ |
1816861306246922240 |