Identifying latent factors in teaching statistics under two learning paradigms

With vast global movements towards rethinking the foundations for higher education, many academic institutions try to ensure that the university curriculum continues to be responsive to the changing requirements of an emerging knowledge society in a globalizing environment. To align with this, some...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arcilla, Rechel Guino, Ocampo, Shirlee R.
Format: text
Published: Animo Repository 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/11995
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-14045
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-140452024-03-14T02:22:35Z Identifying latent factors in teaching statistics under two learning paradigms Arcilla, Rechel Guino Ocampo, Shirlee R. With vast global movements towards rethinking the foundations for higher education, many academic institutions try to ensure that the university curriculum continues to be responsive to the changing requirements of an emerging knowledge society in a globalizing environment. To align with this, some universities adhere to the traditional transmission method of teaching while some try to use new pedagogy like the transformative learning paradigm.In the transmission teaching model, the teacher works as content expert and the primary source of knowledge in which the lecture format is the most often preferred. Under the transformative learning framework, the teacher acts as a facilitator, and the students are active doers and searchers of knowledge.This research conducted a complete enumeration of teaching and learning beliefs and practices involving all students taking statistics under the transmission model and transformative learning paradigm. Factors analysis was applied to identify latent factors on each method. Latent factors such as students' learning environment, teacher's work, integration of computer hands-on, performance assessment tools, real-life application, independent learning, and attitude towards the transformative learning paradigm were identified. Factors scores showed that the two methods differ significantly on student's learning environment, teacher's work, integration of computer hands-on, performance assessment tools, real-life application but not on independent learning and attitude towards the transformative learning paradigm. 2008-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/11995 Faculty Research Work Animo Repository Statistics--Study and teaching Factor analysis Statistics and Probability
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
topic Statistics--Study and teaching
Factor analysis
Statistics and Probability
spellingShingle Statistics--Study and teaching
Factor analysis
Statistics and Probability
Arcilla, Rechel Guino
Ocampo, Shirlee R.
Identifying latent factors in teaching statistics under two learning paradigms
description With vast global movements towards rethinking the foundations for higher education, many academic institutions try to ensure that the university curriculum continues to be responsive to the changing requirements of an emerging knowledge society in a globalizing environment. To align with this, some universities adhere to the traditional transmission method of teaching while some try to use new pedagogy like the transformative learning paradigm.In the transmission teaching model, the teacher works as content expert and the primary source of knowledge in which the lecture format is the most often preferred. Under the transformative learning framework, the teacher acts as a facilitator, and the students are active doers and searchers of knowledge.This research conducted a complete enumeration of teaching and learning beliefs and practices involving all students taking statistics under the transmission model and transformative learning paradigm. Factors analysis was applied to identify latent factors on each method. Latent factors such as students' learning environment, teacher's work, integration of computer hands-on, performance assessment tools, real-life application, independent learning, and attitude towards the transformative learning paradigm were identified. Factors scores showed that the two methods differ significantly on student's learning environment, teacher's work, integration of computer hands-on, performance assessment tools, real-life application but not on independent learning and attitude towards the transformative learning paradigm.
format text
author Arcilla, Rechel Guino
Ocampo, Shirlee R.
author_facet Arcilla, Rechel Guino
Ocampo, Shirlee R.
author_sort Arcilla, Rechel Guino
title Identifying latent factors in teaching statistics under two learning paradigms
title_short Identifying latent factors in teaching statistics under two learning paradigms
title_full Identifying latent factors in teaching statistics under two learning paradigms
title_fullStr Identifying latent factors in teaching statistics under two learning paradigms
title_full_unstemmed Identifying latent factors in teaching statistics under two learning paradigms
title_sort identifying latent factors in teaching statistics under two learning paradigms
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2008
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/11995
_version_ 1800918891019370496