Responding to Student Writing
This paper examines written teacher feedback on selected student papers in an attempt to analyze underlying attitudes embedded in the response episodes. In the past, writing theories have emphasized writing as a fixed and linear process of transferring thoughts on paper. As a consequence, teacher fe...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Published: |
Archīum Ateneo
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://archium.ateneo.edu/kk/vol1/iss2/5 https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/kk/article/1077/viewcontent/_5BKKv00n02_2002_5D_202.4_Article_Paterno.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Ateneo De Manila University |
id |
ph-ateneo-arc.kk-1077 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
ph-ateneo-arc.kk-10772024-12-14T08:42:03Z Responding to Student Writing Paterno, Michelle G. This paper examines written teacher feedback on selected student papers in an attempt to analyze underlying attitudes embedded in the response episodes. In the past, writing theories have emphasized writing as a fixed and linear process of transferring thoughts on paper. As a consequence, teacher feedback reflected these pedagogical principles by treating texts as fixed and finished products. Today, despite the dawn of more process-oriented theories, teacher feedback remains largely product- and form-oriented. While there is a genuine attempt to communicate effectively with the students, such communication is usually hindered by vague, opinionated and negative comments that obstruct student-teacher relationships. In the end, this paper underscores the need for greater self-reflection in order to address the question, “Why do we give the kind of responses that we give, for whose purpose and for what intention?” 2024-12-14T10:07:49Z text application/pdf https://archium.ateneo.edu/kk/vol1/iss2/5 info:doi/10.13185/1656-152x.1077 https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/kk/article/1077/viewcontent/_5BKKv00n02_2002_5D_202.4_Article_Paterno.pdf Kritika Kultura Archīum Ateneo English language teaching; teacher feedback; writing theories |
institution |
Ateneo De Manila University |
building |
Ateneo De Manila University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Philippines Philippines |
content_provider |
Ateneo De Manila University Library |
collection |
archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository |
topic |
English language teaching; teacher feedback; writing theories |
spellingShingle |
English language teaching; teacher feedback; writing theories Paterno, Michelle G. Responding to Student Writing |
description |
This paper examines written teacher feedback on selected student papers in an attempt to analyze underlying attitudes embedded in the response episodes. In the past, writing theories have emphasized writing as a fixed and linear process of transferring thoughts on paper. As a consequence, teacher feedback reflected these pedagogical principles by treating texts as fixed and finished products. Today, despite the dawn of more process-oriented theories, teacher feedback remains largely product- and form-oriented. While there is a genuine attempt to communicate effectively with the students, such communication is usually hindered by vague, opinionated and negative comments that obstruct student-teacher relationships. In the end, this paper underscores the need for greater self-reflection in order to address the question, “Why do we give the kind of responses that we give, for whose purpose and for what intention?” |
format |
text |
author |
Paterno, Michelle G. |
author_facet |
Paterno, Michelle G. |
author_sort |
Paterno, Michelle G. |
title |
Responding to Student Writing |
title_short |
Responding to Student Writing |
title_full |
Responding to Student Writing |
title_fullStr |
Responding to Student Writing |
title_full_unstemmed |
Responding to Student Writing |
title_sort |
responding to student writing |
publisher |
Archīum Ateneo |
publishDate |
2024 |
url |
https://archium.ateneo.edu/kk/vol1/iss2/5 https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/kk/article/1077/viewcontent/_5BKKv00n02_2002_5D_202.4_Article_Paterno.pdf |
_version_ |
1819113646896185344 |