Re-viewing Thomas Lamarre’s The Anime Machine after Hayao Miyazaki’s The Wind Rises: On the Critical Potential of Anime
This article aims to demonstrate how exactly Thomas Lamarre reads movement, plot, and characters in The Anime Machine (2009), as defined to an extent, yet not completely determined by the concept of the animetic machine. Mimicking the first part of Lamarre’s book, it approaches Miyazaki’s last work,...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Published: |
Archīum Ateneo
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://archium.ateneo.edu/kk/vol1/iss26/15 https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/kk/article/1949/viewcontent/_5BKKv00n26_2016_5D_204.4_ForumKritika__C3_87alik.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Ateneo De Manila University |
id |
ph-ateneo-arc.kk-1949 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
ph-ateneo-arc.kk-19492024-12-19T04:18:02Z Re-viewing Thomas Lamarre’s The Anime Machine after Hayao Miyazaki’s The Wind Rises: On the Critical Potential of Anime Çalık, Selen This article aims to demonstrate how exactly Thomas Lamarre reads movement, plot, and characters in The Anime Machine (2009), as defined to an extent, yet not completely determined by the concept of the animetic machine. Mimicking the first part of Lamarre’s book, it approaches Miyazaki’s last work, The Wind Rises (Kaze tachinu, 2013). What Lamarre sees in Miyazaki’s manga eiga is a new way of gaining “a free relation to technology” as idealized by Heideggerian philosophy, but, of course, “in animation” (Lamarre 62). This free, critical relation seems to be most noticeably depicted in Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (Kaze no tani no Naushika, 1984) and Castle in the Sky (Tenkū no shiro Rapyūta, 1986). But does the same kind of criticality that Lamarre finds in Miyazaki’s prior works also apply to the latest one, and if so, to what extent? This again leads to the question whether the conclusions Lamarre arrives at actually capture the critical potential of his theory. In the discussion of these issues, anime is viewed not as a text, but a hub of interrelations, including those between audience groups. Finally, the argumentation arrives at the plurality favored by the medium itself, suggested by Lamarre himself, but not ultimately prioritized. 2024-12-19T06:02:49Z text application/pdf https://archium.ateneo.edu/kk/vol1/iss26/15 info:doi/10.13185/1656-152x.1949 https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/kk/article/1949/viewcontent/_5BKKv00n26_2016_5D_204.4_ForumKritika__C3_87alik.pdf Kritika Kultura Archīum Ateneo animetism/cinematism anime research Heideggerian philosophy of technology media studies structures of movement and depth |
institution |
Ateneo De Manila University |
building |
Ateneo De Manila University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Philippines Philippines |
content_provider |
Ateneo De Manila University Library |
collection |
archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository |
topic |
animetism/cinematism anime research Heideggerian philosophy of technology media studies structures of movement and depth |
spellingShingle |
animetism/cinematism anime research Heideggerian philosophy of technology media studies structures of movement and depth Çalık, Selen Re-viewing Thomas Lamarre’s The Anime Machine after Hayao Miyazaki’s The Wind Rises: On the Critical Potential of Anime |
description |
This article aims to demonstrate how exactly Thomas Lamarre reads movement, plot, and characters in The Anime Machine (2009), as defined to an extent, yet not completely determined by the concept of the animetic machine. Mimicking the first part of Lamarre’s book, it approaches Miyazaki’s last work, The Wind Rises (Kaze tachinu, 2013). What Lamarre sees in Miyazaki’s manga eiga is a new way of gaining “a free relation to technology” as idealized by Heideggerian philosophy, but, of course, “in animation” (Lamarre 62). This free, critical relation seems to be most noticeably depicted in Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (Kaze no tani no Naushika, 1984) and Castle in the Sky (Tenkū no shiro Rapyūta, 1986). But does the same kind of criticality that Lamarre finds in Miyazaki’s prior works also apply to the latest one, and if so, to what extent? This again leads to the question whether the conclusions Lamarre arrives at actually capture the critical potential of his theory. In the discussion of these issues, anime is viewed not as a text, but a hub of interrelations, including those between audience groups. Finally, the argumentation arrives at the plurality favored by the medium itself, suggested by Lamarre himself, but not ultimately prioritized. |
format |
text |
author |
Çalık, Selen |
author_facet |
Çalık, Selen |
author_sort |
Çalık, Selen |
title |
Re-viewing Thomas Lamarre’s The Anime Machine after Hayao Miyazaki’s The Wind Rises: On the Critical Potential of Anime |
title_short |
Re-viewing Thomas Lamarre’s The Anime Machine after Hayao Miyazaki’s The Wind Rises: On the Critical Potential of Anime |
title_full |
Re-viewing Thomas Lamarre’s The Anime Machine after Hayao Miyazaki’s The Wind Rises: On the Critical Potential of Anime |
title_fullStr |
Re-viewing Thomas Lamarre’s The Anime Machine after Hayao Miyazaki’s The Wind Rises: On the Critical Potential of Anime |
title_full_unstemmed |
Re-viewing Thomas Lamarre’s The Anime Machine after Hayao Miyazaki’s The Wind Rises: On the Critical Potential of Anime |
title_sort |
re-viewing thomas lamarre’s the anime machine after hayao miyazaki’s the wind rises: on the critical potential of anime |
publisher |
Archīum Ateneo |
publishDate |
2024 |
url |
https://archium.ateneo.edu/kk/vol1/iss26/15 https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/kk/article/1949/viewcontent/_5BKKv00n26_2016_5D_204.4_ForumKritika__C3_87alik.pdf |
_version_ |
1819113768304508928 |