Comparison between ternary and binary Gray-code based phase unwrapping methods

Phase-shifting profilometry using binary patterns with projector defocusing has been widely used for high-speed 3D measurement. Recently, a ternary Gray-code based phase unwrapping method has been proposed, which enables to accurately unwrap the phase but reduces the required binary patterns. This p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zheng, Dongliang, Kemao, Qian, Da, Feipeng, Seah, Hock Soon
Other Authors: Asundi, Anand K.
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/102952
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/47271
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-102952
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1029522020-03-07T11:48:50Z Comparison between ternary and binary Gray-code based phase unwrapping methods Zheng, Dongliang Kemao, Qian Da, Feipeng Seah, Hock Soon Asundi, Anand K. School of Computer Science and Engineering Fifth International Conference on Optical and Photonics Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Computer science and engineering Projector Defocusing Phase-shifting Profilometry Phase-shifting profilometry using binary patterns with projector defocusing has been widely used for high-speed 3D measurement. Recently, a ternary Gray-code based phase unwrapping method has been proposed, which enables to accurately unwrap the phase but reduces the required binary patterns. This paper presents a comparison between the ternary and the traditional binary Gray code-based phase unwrapping methods. NRF (Natl Research Foundation, S’pore) Published version 2018-12-28T05:22:00Z 2019-12-06T21:02:40Z 2018-12-28T05:22:00Z 2019-12-06T21:02:40Z 2017 Conference Paper Zheng, D., Kemao, Q., Da, F., & Seah, H. S. (2017). Comparison between ternary and binary Gray-code based phase unwrapping methods. Fifth International Conference on Optical and Photonics Engineering, 10449, 104491V-. doi:10.1117/12.2270773 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/102952 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/47271 10.1117/12.2270773 en © 2017 Society of Photo-optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). This paper was published in Fifth International Conference on Optical and Photonics Engineering and is made available as an electronic reprint (preprint) with permission of Society of Photo-optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2270773]. One print or electronic copy may be made for personal use only. Systematic or multiple reproduction, distribution to multiple locations via electronic or other means, duplication of any material in this paper for a fee or for commercial purposes, or modification of the content of the paper is prohibited and is subject to penalties under law. 6 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Engineering::Computer science and engineering
Projector Defocusing
Phase-shifting Profilometry
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering::Computer science and engineering
Projector Defocusing
Phase-shifting Profilometry
Zheng, Dongliang
Kemao, Qian
Da, Feipeng
Seah, Hock Soon
Comparison between ternary and binary Gray-code based phase unwrapping methods
description Phase-shifting profilometry using binary patterns with projector defocusing has been widely used for high-speed 3D measurement. Recently, a ternary Gray-code based phase unwrapping method has been proposed, which enables to accurately unwrap the phase but reduces the required binary patterns. This paper presents a comparison between the ternary and the traditional binary Gray code-based phase unwrapping methods.
author2 Asundi, Anand K.
author_facet Asundi, Anand K.
Zheng, Dongliang
Kemao, Qian
Da, Feipeng
Seah, Hock Soon
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Zheng, Dongliang
Kemao, Qian
Da, Feipeng
Seah, Hock Soon
author_sort Zheng, Dongliang
title Comparison between ternary and binary Gray-code based phase unwrapping methods
title_short Comparison between ternary and binary Gray-code based phase unwrapping methods
title_full Comparison between ternary and binary Gray-code based phase unwrapping methods
title_fullStr Comparison between ternary and binary Gray-code based phase unwrapping methods
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between ternary and binary Gray-code based phase unwrapping methods
title_sort comparison between ternary and binary gray-code based phase unwrapping methods
publishDate 2018
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/102952
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/47271
_version_ 1681038084764860416