Comparison between ternary and binary Gray-code based phase unwrapping methods
Phase-shifting profilometry using binary patterns with projector defocusing has been widely used for high-speed 3D measurement. Recently, a ternary Gray-code based phase unwrapping method has been proposed, which enables to accurately unwrap the phase but reduces the required binary patterns. This p...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/102952 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/47271 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-102952 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1029522020-03-07T11:48:50Z Comparison between ternary and binary Gray-code based phase unwrapping methods Zheng, Dongliang Kemao, Qian Da, Feipeng Seah, Hock Soon Asundi, Anand K. School of Computer Science and Engineering Fifth International Conference on Optical and Photonics Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Computer science and engineering Projector Defocusing Phase-shifting Profilometry Phase-shifting profilometry using binary patterns with projector defocusing has been widely used for high-speed 3D measurement. Recently, a ternary Gray-code based phase unwrapping method has been proposed, which enables to accurately unwrap the phase but reduces the required binary patterns. This paper presents a comparison between the ternary and the traditional binary Gray code-based phase unwrapping methods. NRF (Natl Research Foundation, S’pore) Published version 2018-12-28T05:22:00Z 2019-12-06T21:02:40Z 2018-12-28T05:22:00Z 2019-12-06T21:02:40Z 2017 Conference Paper Zheng, D., Kemao, Q., Da, F., & Seah, H. S. (2017). Comparison between ternary and binary Gray-code based phase unwrapping methods. Fifth International Conference on Optical and Photonics Engineering, 10449, 104491V-. doi:10.1117/12.2270773 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/102952 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/47271 10.1117/12.2270773 en © 2017 Society of Photo-optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). This paper was published in Fifth International Conference on Optical and Photonics Engineering and is made available as an electronic reprint (preprint) with permission of Society of Photo-optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2270773]. One print or electronic copy may be made for personal use only. Systematic or multiple reproduction, distribution to multiple locations via electronic or other means, duplication of any material in this paper for a fee or for commercial purposes, or modification of the content of the paper is prohibited and is subject to penalties under law. 6 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
country |
Singapore |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
DRNTU::Engineering::Computer science and engineering Projector Defocusing Phase-shifting Profilometry |
spellingShingle |
DRNTU::Engineering::Computer science and engineering Projector Defocusing Phase-shifting Profilometry Zheng, Dongliang Kemao, Qian Da, Feipeng Seah, Hock Soon Comparison between ternary and binary Gray-code based phase unwrapping methods |
description |
Phase-shifting profilometry using binary patterns with projector defocusing has been widely used for high-speed 3D measurement. Recently, a ternary Gray-code based phase unwrapping method has been proposed, which enables to accurately unwrap the phase but reduces the required binary patterns. This paper presents a comparison between the ternary and the traditional binary Gray code-based phase unwrapping methods. |
author2 |
Asundi, Anand K. |
author_facet |
Asundi, Anand K. Zheng, Dongliang Kemao, Qian Da, Feipeng Seah, Hock Soon |
format |
Conference or Workshop Item |
author |
Zheng, Dongliang Kemao, Qian Da, Feipeng Seah, Hock Soon |
author_sort |
Zheng, Dongliang |
title |
Comparison between ternary and binary Gray-code based phase unwrapping methods |
title_short |
Comparison between ternary and binary Gray-code based phase unwrapping methods |
title_full |
Comparison between ternary and binary Gray-code based phase unwrapping methods |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between ternary and binary Gray-code based phase unwrapping methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between ternary and binary Gray-code based phase unwrapping methods |
title_sort |
comparison between ternary and binary gray-code based phase unwrapping methods |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/102952 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/47271 |
_version_ |
1681038084764860416 |