Morality or "false consciousness"? How moral naturalists can answer Thrasymachus's challenge
In Book I of Plato's Republic, Thrasymachus famously maintains that ideas of morality and justice are nothing more than an ideology indoctrinated in "the weaker" to benefit "the stronger." This is Thrasymachus's challenge to morality: The thesis that some social arrange...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Luco, Andrés Carlos |
---|---|
Other Authors: | School of Humanities |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142293 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Non-negotiable : why moral naturalism cannot do away with categorical reasons
by: Luco, Andrés Carlos
Published: (2021) -
THEY KNOW NOT WHAT THEY DO: A PRELIMINARY ACCOUNT OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FALSE CONSCIOUSNESS AND MORAL BLAME
by: LEE WILSON
Published: (2017) -
The definition of morality : threading the needle
by: Luco, Andrés Carlos
Published: (2014) -
The problems with moral subjectivism
by: TAN, Seow Hon
Published: (2017) -
Are there distinctively moral reasons?
by: Forcehimes, Andrew T., et al.
Published: (2019)