On evidence and rational beliefs : a thesis in defence of intrapersonal uniqueness
There are three doxastic attitudes an agent can adopt in response to a given proposition: to believe, to not believe or to withhold judgement. What can we conclude about the individual rationality of the agents who, in response to the same set of evidence, come to adopt incompatible doxastic a...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nanyang Technological University
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/147343 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | There are three doxastic attitudes an agent can adopt in response to a given proposition:
to believe, to not believe or to withhold judgement. What can we conclude about the individual
rationality of the agents who, in response to the same set of evidence, come to adopt
incompatible doxastic attitudes towards a target proposition? If there exists a uniquely rational
doxastic attitude that should be adopted in response to a set of evidence, then we can grant that at
most one agent is being rational in any belief-disagreement cases (viz., Uniqueness). Otherwise,
we can grant that more than one agent is being rational in belief-disagreement cases (viz.,
Permissivism).
This paper defends two claims: §1 defends a specific variation of Uniqueness that has no
interpersonal import (viz., Intrapersonal Uniqueness). For a particular person, there is only one
doxastic attitude she can rationally hold towards a proposition based on the evidence. §2 argues
that Intrapersonal Uniqueness is reconcilable with the idea of intersubjective reasonable
disagreements, a phenomenon that has interpersonal import. On this view, reasonable
disagreements persist, not because the evidence is permissive in what it supports, but because
total evidential sharing among agents is an impossibility. |
---|