On evidence and rational beliefs : a thesis in defence of intrapersonal uniqueness
There are three doxastic attitudes an agent can adopt in response to a given proposition: to believe, to not believe or to withhold judgement. What can we conclude about the individual rationality of the agents who, in response to the same set of evidence, come to adopt incompatible doxastic a...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Ng, Sarah Sin Ci |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Teru Miyake |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nanyang Technological University
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/147343 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Introduction to Moore's Paradox: New Essays on Belief, Rationality and the First Person
by: WILLIAMS, John N., et al.
Published: (2007) -
Belief-justification of intuition-based beliefs
by: Chen, Yi
Published: (2021) -
‘God loves you’ : in defence of theological statements
by: D'Cruz, Joseph Edwin
Published: (2020) -
Why the diner is not defended: a critical examination of the diner's defence
by: Branson, Zachary Andrew
Published: (2023) -
A moral defence for the case of non-fungible tokens (NFTs)
by: Tiew, Yuki Hiew Foo
Published: (2023)