Peer disagreement, philosophical incommensurability and metaphilosophy

Peer disagreement is a paradoxical issue in philosophy. If philosophers cannot maintain the rationality of how thinkers can hold on to their beliefs, they would be forced to adopt a skeptical attitude towards philosophical beliefs. Analytic philosophers have dealt with this issue by advocating for e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Muhammad Faiz Mohamad Zahari
Other Authors: Dimitris Apostolopoulos
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: Nanyang Technological University 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/147422
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-147422
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1474222023-03-11T20:09:35Z Peer disagreement, philosophical incommensurability and metaphilosophy Muhammad Faiz Mohamad Zahari Dimitris Apostolopoulos School of Humanities d.apostolopoulos@ntu.edu.sg Humanities::Philosophy Peer disagreement is a paradoxical issue in philosophy. If philosophers cannot maintain the rationality of how thinkers can hold on to their beliefs, they would be forced to adopt a skeptical attitude towards philosophical beliefs. Analytic philosophers have dealt with this issue by advocating for epistemological strategies that focus on maintaining rationality when thinkers are faced with peer disagreement. However, Richard Colledge suggests that Analytic philosophy needs to acknowledge the concept of philosophical incommensurability to properly respond to peer disagreement. In this thesis, I assess if Colledge’s suggestions are constructive. I provide a brief sketch of peer disagreement in Analytic philosophy, and I consider if the ideas of Heidegger and Gadamer from Continental philosophy are relevant for improving the peer disagreement debate in Analytic philosophy. Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy 2021-04-01T07:12:31Z 2021-04-01T07:12:31Z 2021 Final Year Project (FYP) Muhammad Faiz Mohamad Zahari (2021). Peer disagreement, philosophical incommensurability and metaphilosophy. Final Year Project (FYP), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/147422 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/147422 en application/pdf Nanyang Technological University
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Humanities::Philosophy
spellingShingle Humanities::Philosophy
Muhammad Faiz Mohamad Zahari
Peer disagreement, philosophical incommensurability and metaphilosophy
description Peer disagreement is a paradoxical issue in philosophy. If philosophers cannot maintain the rationality of how thinkers can hold on to their beliefs, they would be forced to adopt a skeptical attitude towards philosophical beliefs. Analytic philosophers have dealt with this issue by advocating for epistemological strategies that focus on maintaining rationality when thinkers are faced with peer disagreement. However, Richard Colledge suggests that Analytic philosophy needs to acknowledge the concept of philosophical incommensurability to properly respond to peer disagreement. In this thesis, I assess if Colledge’s suggestions are constructive. I provide a brief sketch of peer disagreement in Analytic philosophy, and I consider if the ideas of Heidegger and Gadamer from Continental philosophy are relevant for improving the peer disagreement debate in Analytic philosophy.
author2 Dimitris Apostolopoulos
author_facet Dimitris Apostolopoulos
Muhammad Faiz Mohamad Zahari
format Final Year Project
author Muhammad Faiz Mohamad Zahari
author_sort Muhammad Faiz Mohamad Zahari
title Peer disagreement, philosophical incommensurability and metaphilosophy
title_short Peer disagreement, philosophical incommensurability and metaphilosophy
title_full Peer disagreement, philosophical incommensurability and metaphilosophy
title_fullStr Peer disagreement, philosophical incommensurability and metaphilosophy
title_full_unstemmed Peer disagreement, philosophical incommensurability and metaphilosophy
title_sort peer disagreement, philosophical incommensurability and metaphilosophy
publisher Nanyang Technological University
publishDate 2021
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/147422
_version_ 1761781429106114560