Peer disagreement, philosophical incommensurability and metaphilosophy
Peer disagreement is a paradoxical issue in philosophy. If philosophers cannot maintain the rationality of how thinkers can hold on to their beliefs, they would be forced to adopt a skeptical attitude towards philosophical beliefs. Analytic philosophers have dealt with this issue by advocating for e...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Muhammad Faiz Mohamad Zahari |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Dimitris Apostolopoulos |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nanyang Technological University
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/147422 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
What is epistemic peer disagreement, and how should we deal with it?
by: Wang, Fangjie
Published: (2021) -
The epistemic significance of religious disagreements: cases of unconfirmed superiority disagreements
by: Choo, Frederick Wen Yeong
Published: (2022) -
Rationality, Ethical Incommensurability and Existential Communication
by: MOONEY, T. Brian
Published: (2010) -
Causal theories of explanation and the challenge of explanatory disagreement
by: Jansson, Lina
Published: (2015) -
The hermeneutic self: Sartre and philosophical hermeneutics
by: Lim, Wan Ting
Published: (2022)