Summative and formative style anatomy practical examinations: do they have impact on students' performance and drive for learning?

Anatomical knowledge is commonly assessed by practical examinations that are often administered in summative format. The format of anatomy practical examination was changed at the Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine in Singapore from summative (graded; must pass) to formative (ungraded; no pass/fail)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mogali, Sreenivasulu Reddy, Rotgans, Jerome Ingmar, Rosby, Lucy, Ferenczi, Michael Alan, Beer, Naomi Low
Other Authors: Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/161233
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-161233
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1612332022-08-22T02:57:49Z Summative and formative style anatomy practical examinations: do they have impact on students' performance and drive for learning? Mogali, Sreenivasulu Reddy Rotgans, Jerome Ingmar Rosby, Lucy Ferenczi, Michael Alan Beer, Naomi Low Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) Science::Medicine Gross Anatomy Education Medical Education Anatomical knowledge is commonly assessed by practical examinations that are often administered in summative format. The format of anatomy practical examination was changed at the Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine in Singapore from summative (graded; must pass) to formative (ungraded; no pass/fail) in academic year (AY) 2017-2018. Both assessment formats were undertaken online, but the formative mode used a team-based learning activity comprising individual and team assessments. This gave an unique opportunity to investigate: (1) the impact of two different online assessment formats on student performance in practical examination; (2) the impact of new formative practical examination on students' performance in summative examinations; and (3) students' opinions of these two practical examination formats. The class of 2021 perceptions was obtained as they experienced both formats. A retrospective cohort study was also conducted to analyze the Year 2 students' performance in anatomy practical and year-end summative examinations of cohorts AY 2015-2016, AY 2016-2017 (summative format), and AY 2017-2018 (formative format). There were no significant differences in students' performance between two practical examination formats. The cohort who experienced the formative format, performed significantly better in summative examinations (mean ± SD: 82.32 ± 10.22%) compared with the cohort who experienced the summative format (73.77 ± 11.09%) (P < 0.001). Students highlighted positive features of the formative practical examination, including team reinforcement of learning, instant feedback, and enhanced learning. These findings indicate that students continue to study for anatomy practical examination without the need for external drivers. The team-based learning style practical examination enhances students' performance in summative examinations. 2022-08-22T02:57:49Z 2022-08-22T02:57:49Z 2020 Journal Article Mogali, S. R., Rotgans, J. I., Rosby, L., Ferenczi, M. A. & Beer, N. L. (2020). Summative and formative style anatomy practical examinations: do they have impact on students' performance and drive for learning?. Anatomical Sciences Education, 13(5), 581-590. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ase.1931 1935-9772 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/161233 10.1002/ase.1931 31733172 2-s2.0-85076861137 5 13 581 590 en Anatomical Sciences Education © 2019 American Association of Anatomists. All rights reserved.
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Science::Medicine
Gross Anatomy Education
Medical Education
spellingShingle Science::Medicine
Gross Anatomy Education
Medical Education
Mogali, Sreenivasulu Reddy
Rotgans, Jerome Ingmar
Rosby, Lucy
Ferenczi, Michael Alan
Beer, Naomi Low
Summative and formative style anatomy practical examinations: do they have impact on students' performance and drive for learning?
description Anatomical knowledge is commonly assessed by practical examinations that are often administered in summative format. The format of anatomy practical examination was changed at the Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine in Singapore from summative (graded; must pass) to formative (ungraded; no pass/fail) in academic year (AY) 2017-2018. Both assessment formats were undertaken online, but the formative mode used a team-based learning activity comprising individual and team assessments. This gave an unique opportunity to investigate: (1) the impact of two different online assessment formats on student performance in practical examination; (2) the impact of new formative practical examination on students' performance in summative examinations; and (3) students' opinions of these two practical examination formats. The class of 2021 perceptions was obtained as they experienced both formats. A retrospective cohort study was also conducted to analyze the Year 2 students' performance in anatomy practical and year-end summative examinations of cohorts AY 2015-2016, AY 2016-2017 (summative format), and AY 2017-2018 (formative format). There were no significant differences in students' performance between two practical examination formats. The cohort who experienced the formative format, performed significantly better in summative examinations (mean ± SD: 82.32 ± 10.22%) compared with the cohort who experienced the summative format (73.77 ± 11.09%) (P < 0.001). Students highlighted positive features of the formative practical examination, including team reinforcement of learning, instant feedback, and enhanced learning. These findings indicate that students continue to study for anatomy practical examination without the need for external drivers. The team-based learning style practical examination enhances students' performance in summative examinations.
author2 Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine)
author_facet Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine)
Mogali, Sreenivasulu Reddy
Rotgans, Jerome Ingmar
Rosby, Lucy
Ferenczi, Michael Alan
Beer, Naomi Low
format Article
author Mogali, Sreenivasulu Reddy
Rotgans, Jerome Ingmar
Rosby, Lucy
Ferenczi, Michael Alan
Beer, Naomi Low
author_sort Mogali, Sreenivasulu Reddy
title Summative and formative style anatomy practical examinations: do they have impact on students' performance and drive for learning?
title_short Summative and formative style anatomy practical examinations: do they have impact on students' performance and drive for learning?
title_full Summative and formative style anatomy practical examinations: do they have impact on students' performance and drive for learning?
title_fullStr Summative and formative style anatomy practical examinations: do they have impact on students' performance and drive for learning?
title_full_unstemmed Summative and formative style anatomy practical examinations: do they have impact on students' performance and drive for learning?
title_sort summative and formative style anatomy practical examinations: do they have impact on students' performance and drive for learning?
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/161233
_version_ 1743119614150180864