A defence of Dworkin's arguments against Hartian legal positivism
Dworkin’s critique against the dominant Hartian position in general jurisprudence has no doubt been greatly influential ever since its appearance. Dworkin’s critique aims mainly at Hart’s separation thesis, namely the thesis that legal reasoning is completely cut off from any moral considerations. D...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Chow, Zhen Yi |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Andrew T. Forcehimes |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nanyang Technological University
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/174498 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
On the lives not worth starting: a defence of the veil argument against the non-identity problem
by: Ang, Wei Xiang
Published: (2023) -
A Reply to Legal Positivism: The Argument from Injustice [Book review]
by: TAN, Seow Hon
Published: (2003) -
The ethics of gossiping: an objection against a Kantian account of gossip
by: Ong, Si Ying
Published: (2024) -
The argument from variation against using one’s own intuitions as evidence
by: Goh, Esther
Published: (2020) -
‘God loves you’ : in defence of theological statements
by: D'Cruz, Joseph Edwin
Published: (2020)