Which IR theory, liberalism, realism or constructivism, best explains the interaction between ASEAN and the two superpowers, the US and China?
China's rise has prompted a re-evaluation of the geopolitical landscape in Southeast Asia, compelling both the United States (US) and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) nations to recalibrate their strategies and engagements. International Relation (IR) theorists from the likes...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Pua, Zopa Wei Yuan |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Hoo Tiang Boon |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nanyang Technological University
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/175626 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Classical realism: the "ASEAN Way" to relevance
by: Oui, Shawn De Peng
Published: (2024) -
Why Collective Identity Matters:
Constructivism and the Absence of ASEAN’s Role in the Rohingya Crisis
by: Rosyidin, Mohamad
Published: (2017) -
Explaining North Korean Nuclear Weapons Motivations: Constructivism, Liberalism, and Realism
by: Nah, Liang Tuang
Published: (2016) -
Ethics and Leadership in Foreign Policy: The Case of Singapore
by: Jimmy Lim Wei Chung
Published: (2020) -
Social Scientific Realism
by: MOK WAN HAO JACOB
Published: (2013)