Questionable peer review practices
Background. Peer review is a crucial system in academic publishing. However, this system is often undermined by certain malpractices. Objective. This paper discusses questionable peer review practices (QPRPs) that undermine the efficacy of peer review systems in academic publishing. Methods. We...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Sasaki, Kyoshiro, Yamada, Yuki |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Kansai University, Japan |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/181288 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Peer review in clinical radiology practice
by: Rathachai Kaewlai, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Question classification in community based question answering services
by: Chua, Yuki Pei Cheng.
Published: (2011) -
PeerLens: Peer-inspired interactive learning path planning in online question pool
by: XIA, Meng, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Practical algorithm for minimum delay peer-to-peer media streaming
by: Luo, Jun.
Published: (2011) -
THE GUIDED PEER QUESTIONING TECHNIQUE AND ITS EFFECT ON ORAL PRODUCTION
by: AYADURAY JEYALAXMY
Published: (2020)