Risky business : on the anthropomorphism of artificial intelligence
In his book, Superintelligence, Nick Bostrom highlights the exponential increase in the “rate of growth of economic productivity and technological capacity” in the advancement of the human race (2). Bostrom’s seminal work is an exploration of the prospect of a superintelligence – a superhuman level...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/70402 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-70402 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-704022019-12-10T13:12:25Z Risky business : on the anthropomorphism of artificial intelligence Divya Mehta Jeetendra Graham John Matthews School of Humanities and Social Sciences DRNTU::Humanities In his book, Superintelligence, Nick Bostrom highlights the exponential increase in the “rate of growth of economic productivity and technological capacity” in the advancement of the human race (2). Bostrom’s seminal work is an exploration of the prospect of a superintelligence – a superhuman level of machine intelligence that has far reaching ontological consequences for humanity. He lenses his observations and conjectures of superintelligence with German sociologist Ulrich Beck’s risk theory. Texts such as Philip K. Dick’s Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep (Electric Sheep), William Gibson’s Neuromancer, D.F. Jones’ Colossus and Isaac Asimov’s I, Robot provide a means of illustrating a variety of scenarios dealing with AI. Such texts put artificial intelligence within the realm of human understanding. They make AI accessible and familiar through anthropomorphism – Bostrom warns us that the anthropomorphism of artificial intelligence (AI) may lead us to underestimate the risks of AI. This paper examines the four texts and the way they employ anthropomorphism, to conclude that while it is useful to aid our understanding, it is also a problematic framework in which to do so. Bachelor of Arts 2017-04-24T01:58:04Z 2017-04-24T01:58:04Z 2017 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/70402 en Nanyang Technological University 37 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
country |
Singapore |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
DRNTU::Humanities |
spellingShingle |
DRNTU::Humanities Divya Mehta Jeetendra Risky business : on the anthropomorphism of artificial intelligence |
description |
In his book, Superintelligence, Nick Bostrom highlights the exponential increase in the “rate of growth of economic productivity and technological capacity” in the advancement of the human race (2). Bostrom’s seminal work is an exploration of the prospect of a superintelligence – a superhuman level of machine intelligence that has far reaching ontological consequences for humanity. He lenses his observations and conjectures of superintelligence with German sociologist Ulrich Beck’s risk theory. Texts such as Philip K. Dick’s Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep (Electric Sheep), William Gibson’s Neuromancer, D.F. Jones’ Colossus and Isaac Asimov’s I, Robot provide a means of illustrating a variety of scenarios dealing with AI. Such texts put artificial intelligence within the realm of human understanding. They make AI accessible and familiar through anthropomorphism – Bostrom warns us that the anthropomorphism of artificial intelligence (AI) may lead us to underestimate the risks of AI. This paper examines the four texts and the way they employ anthropomorphism, to conclude that while it is useful to aid our understanding, it is also a problematic framework in which to do so. |
author2 |
Graham John Matthews |
author_facet |
Graham John Matthews Divya Mehta Jeetendra |
format |
Final Year Project |
author |
Divya Mehta Jeetendra |
author_sort |
Divya Mehta Jeetendra |
title |
Risky business : on the anthropomorphism of artificial intelligence |
title_short |
Risky business : on the anthropomorphism of artificial intelligence |
title_full |
Risky business : on the anthropomorphism of artificial intelligence |
title_fullStr |
Risky business : on the anthropomorphism of artificial intelligence |
title_full_unstemmed |
Risky business : on the anthropomorphism of artificial intelligence |
title_sort |
risky business : on the anthropomorphism of artificial intelligence |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10356/70402 |
_version_ |
1681042353321672704 |