Comparison of various intensity levels for variable resistance countermovement jump on inducing postactivation potentiation

Postactivation potentiation (PAP) is a phenomenon that involves the preconditioning of muscles through conditioning activities (CAs) to induce acute improvements in performance. The purpose of this study was to establish the optimum variable resistance level for loaded countermovement jump (LCMJ) to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chen, Siow Ee
Other Authors: Kawabata Masato
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/78821
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-78821
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-788212020-09-27T20:23:46Z Comparison of various intensity levels for variable resistance countermovement jump on inducing postactivation potentiation Chen, Siow Ee Kawabata Masato National Institute of Education Science::General Postactivation potentiation (PAP) is a phenomenon that involves the preconditioning of muscles through conditioning activities (CAs) to induce acute improvements in performance. The purpose of this study was to establish the optimum variable resistance level for loaded countermovement jump (LCMJ) to induce PAP. It was hypothesized that the resistance level associated with the highest peak power during the LCMJ would induce the greatest PAP effect. In this study, 12 male resistance trained competitive power-based sports athletes from Singapore Sport Institute and Nanyang Technological University (Age = 24.33 ± 2.50 years; Height = 1.76 ± 0.06 m; Body Mass = 73.71 ± 8.56 kg; Body Mass Index = 23.70 ± 1.97 kg/m2) were recruited. They went through four different conditions: countermovement jump (CMJ) with no load (control), LCMJ with light band (orange), medium band (red) or heavy band (blue) in a randomized crossover manner to compare the effects of various intensity levels for LCMJ on inducing PAP. Findings showed no significant difference in mean of pre and posttest jump height (p = .187), peak power output (p = .372) and peak velocity (p = .337) across four different conditions, however, there was a significant difference in the mean of pre and posttest peak force (p = .019) between conditions. In conclusion, performing LCMJ improved peak force production but not other variables hence it was not an effective CA to be used to improve subsequent jumping performance. Keywords: loaded countermovement jump, variable resistance, Postactivation potentiation, plyometric Bachelor of Science (Sport Science and Management) 2019-07-01T01:04:58Z 2019-07-01T01:04:58Z 2019 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/78821 en 50 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Science::General
spellingShingle Science::General
Chen, Siow Ee
Comparison of various intensity levels for variable resistance countermovement jump on inducing postactivation potentiation
description Postactivation potentiation (PAP) is a phenomenon that involves the preconditioning of muscles through conditioning activities (CAs) to induce acute improvements in performance. The purpose of this study was to establish the optimum variable resistance level for loaded countermovement jump (LCMJ) to induce PAP. It was hypothesized that the resistance level associated with the highest peak power during the LCMJ would induce the greatest PAP effect. In this study, 12 male resistance trained competitive power-based sports athletes from Singapore Sport Institute and Nanyang Technological University (Age = 24.33 ± 2.50 years; Height = 1.76 ± 0.06 m; Body Mass = 73.71 ± 8.56 kg; Body Mass Index = 23.70 ± 1.97 kg/m2) were recruited. They went through four different conditions: countermovement jump (CMJ) with no load (control), LCMJ with light band (orange), medium band (red) or heavy band (blue) in a randomized crossover manner to compare the effects of various intensity levels for LCMJ on inducing PAP. Findings showed no significant difference in mean of pre and posttest jump height (p = .187), peak power output (p = .372) and peak velocity (p = .337) across four different conditions, however, there was a significant difference in the mean of pre and posttest peak force (p = .019) between conditions. In conclusion, performing LCMJ improved peak force production but not other variables hence it was not an effective CA to be used to improve subsequent jumping performance. Keywords: loaded countermovement jump, variable resistance, Postactivation potentiation, plyometric
author2 Kawabata Masato
author_facet Kawabata Masato
Chen, Siow Ee
format Final Year Project
author Chen, Siow Ee
author_sort Chen, Siow Ee
title Comparison of various intensity levels for variable resistance countermovement jump on inducing postactivation potentiation
title_short Comparison of various intensity levels for variable resistance countermovement jump on inducing postactivation potentiation
title_full Comparison of various intensity levels for variable resistance countermovement jump on inducing postactivation potentiation
title_fullStr Comparison of various intensity levels for variable resistance countermovement jump on inducing postactivation potentiation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of various intensity levels for variable resistance countermovement jump on inducing postactivation potentiation
title_sort comparison of various intensity levels for variable resistance countermovement jump on inducing postactivation potentiation
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/78821
_version_ 1681058391609311232