English versus Chinese: A Cross-Lingual Study of Community Question Answering Sites
This paper conducts a cross-lingual study across six community question answering sites (CQAs) from two popular languages used on the internet, English and Chinese. The CQAs from the two languages are compared on the basis of three perspectives, namely, answer quality, answer responsiveness, and cor...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/85830 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/43862 http://www.iaeng.org/publication/IMECS2013/IMECS2013_pp368-373.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-85830 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-858302019-12-06T16:10:57Z English versus Chinese: A Cross-Lingual Study of Community Question Answering Sites Chua, Alton Yeow Kuan Banerjee, Snehasish Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists (IMECS) 2013 Cross-lingual Community Question Answering This paper conducts a cross-lingual study across six community question answering sites (CQAs) from two popular languages used on the internet, English and Chinese. The CQAs from the two languages are compared on the basis of three perspectives, namely, answer quality, answer responsiveness, and corpus comprehensiveness. Results indicate that there exist no statistically significant differences between the English CQAs and the Chinese CQAs in terms of answer quality. However, English CQAs appear to fare better in terms of answer responsiveness, whereas Chinese CQAs seem to perform better in terms of corpus comprehensiveness. The implications of the findings are discussed. Finally, the paper concludes with notes on limitations and future work. Published version 2017-10-12T05:04:39Z 2019-12-06T16:10:57Z 2017-10-12T05:04:39Z 2019-12-06T16:10:57Z 2013 Conference Paper Chua, A. Y. K., & Banerjee, S. (2013). English versus Chinese: A cross-lingual study of community question answering sites. Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists (IMECS) 2013, 368-373. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/85830 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/43862 http://www.iaeng.org/publication/IMECS2013/IMECS2013_pp368-373.pdf en © 2013 International Association of Engineers (IAENG). This paper was published in Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists (IMECS) 2013 and is made available as an electronic reprint (preprint) with permission of International Association of Engineers (IAENG). The published version is available at: [http://www.iaeng.org/publication/IMECS2013/IMECS2013_pp368-373.pdf]. One print or electronic copy may be made for personal use only. Systematic or multiple reproduction, distribution to multiple locations via electronic or other means, duplication of any material in this paper for a fee or for commercial purposes, or modification of the content of the paper is prohibited and is subject to penalties under law. 6 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
country |
Singapore |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Cross-lingual Community Question Answering |
spellingShingle |
Cross-lingual Community Question Answering Chua, Alton Yeow Kuan Banerjee, Snehasish English versus Chinese: A Cross-Lingual Study of Community Question Answering Sites |
description |
This paper conducts a cross-lingual study across six community question answering sites (CQAs) from two popular languages used on the internet, English and Chinese. The CQAs from the two languages are compared on the basis of three perspectives, namely, answer quality, answer responsiveness, and corpus comprehensiveness. Results indicate that there exist no statistically significant differences between the English CQAs and the Chinese CQAs in terms of answer quality. However, English CQAs appear to fare better in terms of answer responsiveness, whereas Chinese CQAs seem to perform better in terms of corpus comprehensiveness. The implications of the findings are discussed. Finally, the paper concludes with notes on limitations and future work. |
author2 |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information |
author_facet |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Chua, Alton Yeow Kuan Banerjee, Snehasish |
format |
Conference or Workshop Item |
author |
Chua, Alton Yeow Kuan Banerjee, Snehasish |
author_sort |
Chua, Alton Yeow Kuan |
title |
English versus Chinese: A Cross-Lingual Study of Community Question Answering Sites |
title_short |
English versus Chinese: A Cross-Lingual Study of Community Question Answering Sites |
title_full |
English versus Chinese: A Cross-Lingual Study of Community Question Answering Sites |
title_fullStr |
English versus Chinese: A Cross-Lingual Study of Community Question Answering Sites |
title_full_unstemmed |
English versus Chinese: A Cross-Lingual Study of Community Question Answering Sites |
title_sort |
english versus chinese: a cross-lingual study of community question answering sites |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/85830 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/43862 http://www.iaeng.org/publication/IMECS2013/IMECS2013_pp368-373.pdf |
_version_ |
1681046232763465728 |