Actualism doesn’t have control issues : a reply to Cohen and Timmerman
Recently, Cohen and Timmerman (Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy, 10(3), 1–18, 2016) argue that actualism has control issues. The view should be rejected, they claim, as it recognizes a morally irrelevant distinction between counterfactuals over which agents exercise the same kind of control...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Forcehimes, Andrew T., Semrau, Luke |
---|---|
Other Authors: | School of Humanities |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90121 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48437 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
The difference we make : a reply to Pinkert
by: Forcehimes, Andrew T., et al.
Published: (2020) -
Relationship sensitive consequentialism Is regrettable
by: Forcehimes, Andrew T., et al.
Published: (2022) -
Non-compliance shouldn't be better
by: Forcehimes, Andrew T., et al.
Published: (2019) -
Why the method of cases doesn’t work
by: Suhler, Christopher Louis
Published: (2020) -
Thinking through utilitarianism : a guide to contemporary arguments
by: Forcehimes, Andrew T., et al.
Published: (2022)