Defining the digital divide : the role of e-readiness indicators

Purpose – To show how e-readiness indicators, specifically the Networked Readiness Index (NRI), participate in the work of defining policy problems. Design/methodology/approach – The article critically examines the Networked Readiness Index in terms of its presentation and its underlying mod...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Luyt, Brendan
Other Authors: Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90710
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/8347
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-90710
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-907102020-03-07T12:15:50Z Defining the digital divide : the role of e-readiness indicators Luyt, Brendan Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information DRNTU::Library and information science::Archives and records management::Digital preservation Purpose – To show how e-readiness indicators, specifically the Networked Readiness Index (NRI), participate in the work of defining policy problems. Design/methodology/approach – The article critically examines the Networked Readiness Index in terms of its presentation and its underlying model. It relies on an approach to policy analysis that views policy problems as socially constructed. Findings – E-readiness assessment tools purport to show how ready the nations of the world are to exploit the potential of new information and communication technologies. Yet they do more than that; being actively engaged in constructing policy problems. In the case of the NRI, the problem of the international digital divide is defined in a particular way that privileges certain interests while at the same time legitimatizing its inclusion on the agenda of international organizations as a problem worthy of sustained attention. Practical implications – The findings of the article suggest a need for alternative indicators that register the voices of a wider range of groups and could therefore create a more inclusive digital divide policy problem. Originality/value – Little critical (as opposed to technical) analysis of e-readiness indicators exits in the literature. By focusing on these tools, the article contributes to the debate surrounding the issue of the digital divide. Accepted version 2012-07-30T01:29:07Z 2019-12-06T17:52:35Z 2012-07-30T01:29:07Z 2019-12-06T17:52:35Z 2006 2006 Journal Article Luyt, B. (2006). Defining the digital divide: the role of e-readiness indicators. Aslib Proceedings, 58(4), 276–291. 0001-253X https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90710 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/8347 10.1108/00012530610687669 en Aslib proceedings © 2006 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Aslib Proceedings, Emerald Group Publishing Limited. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00012530610687669]. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Library and information science::Archives and records management::Digital preservation
spellingShingle DRNTU::Library and information science::Archives and records management::Digital preservation
Luyt, Brendan
Defining the digital divide : the role of e-readiness indicators
description Purpose – To show how e-readiness indicators, specifically the Networked Readiness Index (NRI), participate in the work of defining policy problems. Design/methodology/approach – The article critically examines the Networked Readiness Index in terms of its presentation and its underlying model. It relies on an approach to policy analysis that views policy problems as socially constructed. Findings – E-readiness assessment tools purport to show how ready the nations of the world are to exploit the potential of new information and communication technologies. Yet they do more than that; being actively engaged in constructing policy problems. In the case of the NRI, the problem of the international digital divide is defined in a particular way that privileges certain interests while at the same time legitimatizing its inclusion on the agenda of international organizations as a problem worthy of sustained attention. Practical implications – The findings of the article suggest a need for alternative indicators that register the voices of a wider range of groups and could therefore create a more inclusive digital divide policy problem. Originality/value – Little critical (as opposed to technical) analysis of e-readiness indicators exits in the literature. By focusing on these tools, the article contributes to the debate surrounding the issue of the digital divide.
author2 Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
author_facet Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Luyt, Brendan
format Article
author Luyt, Brendan
author_sort Luyt, Brendan
title Defining the digital divide : the role of e-readiness indicators
title_short Defining the digital divide : the role of e-readiness indicators
title_full Defining the digital divide : the role of e-readiness indicators
title_fullStr Defining the digital divide : the role of e-readiness indicators
title_full_unstemmed Defining the digital divide : the role of e-readiness indicators
title_sort defining the digital divide : the role of e-readiness indicators
publishDate 2012
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90710
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/8347
_version_ 1681038776110940160