Functional area lower bound and upper bound on multicomponent selection for interval scheduling
In a realistic register-transfer-level component library, there usually exist several different hardware implementations for one generic function. This gives rise to a large design space of component selection which is interleaved with the...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/91566 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/6314 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | In a realistic register-transfer-level component
library, there usually exist several different hardware implementations
for one generic function. This gives rise to a large
design space of component selection which is interleaved with the
scheduling of operations. Previous methods ignored the presence
of multicomponent selection in the process of lower/upper bound
estimation of scheduling, and produced the local lower/upper
bounds which would cause the suboptimum designs.
Opposite to the previous methods, we compute, in this paper,
the lower/upper bounds which consider scheduling and component
selection simultaneously. A new problem of multicomponent
selection integrated with interval scheduling is studied.We present
a very interesting and important result that both the lower bound
and upper bound of multicomponent selection are obtained on
the most cost-effective components which have the minimum
area-delay products. This property leads to that the lower bound
and upper bound of multicomponent selection can be calculated
efficiently. An integer linear programming model and a surrogate
relaxation technique are proposed to derive an optimum surrogate
lower bound which has the asymptotic performance ratio less
than two for a single type of function. An upper bound with
the same asymptotic performance ratio is also obtained which
turns out to be the optimum solution value of the traditional
unicomponent selection with the most cost-effective components.
Both the theoretical analysis and the experimental results show
that the performance of our bounds are very promising. |
---|