What Makes and What Does Not Make a Real Option? A Study of International Joint Ventures
This paper examines the boundaries of real options logic, with an application to joint ventures (JVs). We distinguish between forms of uncertainty that are resolved endogenously and those that are resolved exogenously, and theorize that only exogenous uncertainty will have the impact predicted by re...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/1530 https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.17 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-2529 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-25292016-06-03T09:37:52Z What Makes and What Does Not Make a Real Option? A Study of International Joint Ventures CUYPERS, Ilya MARTIN, Xavier This paper examines the boundaries of real options logic, with an application to joint ventures (JVs). We distinguish between forms of uncertainty that are resolved endogenously and those that are resolved exogenously, and theorize that only exogenous uncertainty will have the impact predicted by real options theory on a foreign investor's choice of how large an equity share to take in a JV. We theorize that macroeconomic and institutional variables generate exogenous uncertainty whereas, by contrast, cultural distance and choices pertaining to corporate scope and product or process development activities involve endogenous sources of uncertainty that investors can both assess and act upon without having to “wait and see”. Using a sample of 6472 Sino-foreign JVs, we find support for our predictions. We discuss and implement proper methods to test for the existence of null effects, as is relevant to establish the boundaries of a theory such as real options theory. We draw implications for research and practice on JVs - specifically equity share decisions, which deserve more attention - and real options, including suitable uses and desirable extensions of the concept. 2010-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/1530 info:doi/10.1057/jibs.2009.17 https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.17 Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University alliances and joint ventures China equity shares real options uncertainty International Business Strategic Management Policy |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
alliances and joint ventures China equity shares real options uncertainty International Business Strategic Management Policy |
spellingShingle |
alliances and joint ventures China equity shares real options uncertainty International Business Strategic Management Policy CUYPERS, Ilya MARTIN, Xavier What Makes and What Does Not Make a Real Option? A Study of International Joint Ventures |
description |
This paper examines the boundaries of real options logic, with an application to joint ventures (JVs). We distinguish between forms of uncertainty that are resolved endogenously and those that are resolved exogenously, and theorize that only exogenous uncertainty will have the impact predicted by real options theory on a foreign investor's choice of how large an equity share to take in a JV. We theorize that macroeconomic and institutional variables generate exogenous uncertainty whereas, by contrast, cultural distance and choices pertaining to corporate scope and product or process development activities involve endogenous sources of uncertainty that investors can both assess and act upon without having to “wait and see”. Using a sample of 6472 Sino-foreign JVs, we find support for our predictions. We discuss and implement proper methods to test for the existence of null effects, as is relevant to establish the boundaries of a theory such as real options theory. We draw implications for research and practice on JVs - specifically equity share decisions, which deserve more attention - and real options, including suitable uses and desirable extensions of the concept. |
format |
text |
author |
CUYPERS, Ilya MARTIN, Xavier |
author_facet |
CUYPERS, Ilya MARTIN, Xavier |
author_sort |
CUYPERS, Ilya |
title |
What Makes and What Does Not Make a Real Option? A Study of International Joint Ventures |
title_short |
What Makes and What Does Not Make a Real Option? A Study of International Joint Ventures |
title_full |
What Makes and What Does Not Make a Real Option? A Study of International Joint Ventures |
title_fullStr |
What Makes and What Does Not Make a Real Option? A Study of International Joint Ventures |
title_full_unstemmed |
What Makes and What Does Not Make a Real Option? A Study of International Joint Ventures |
title_sort |
what makes and what does not make a real option? a study of international joint ventures |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/1530 https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.17 |
_version_ |
1770569935690399744 |