Harmful Help: The Costs of Backing up Behavior in Teams

Prior research on backing-up behavior has indicated that it is beneficial to teams (C. O. L. H. Porter, 2005; C. O. L. H. Porter et al., 2003). This literature has focused on how backing-up behavior aids backup recipients in tasks in which workload is unevenly distributed among team members. The aut...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barnes, Christopher M., Hollenbeck, J. R., WAGNER, David Turley, DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Schwind, K. M.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/1746
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/2745/viewcontent/Barnes__Hollenbeck__Wagner__DeRue__Nahrgang____Schwind__2008____JAP___Harmful_Help___Costs_of_backing_up_behavior_in_teams_clean.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
Description
Summary:Prior research on backing-up behavior has indicated that it is beneficial to teams (C. O. L. H. Porter, 2005; C. O. L. H. Porter et al., 2003). This literature has focused on how backing-up behavior aids backup recipients in tasks in which workload is unevenly distributed among team members. The authors of the present study examined different contexts of workload distribution and found that, in addition to the initial benefits to backup recipients, there are initial and subsequent costs. Backing-up behavior leads backup providers to neglect their own taskwork, especially when workload is evenly distributed. Team members who receive high amounts of backing-up behavior decrease their taskwork in a subsequent task, especially when a team member can observe their workload. These findings indicate that it is important to consider both the benefits and costs of engaging in backing-up behavior.