To extend or not to extend: Success determinants of brand line extensions
The authors study the determinants of line extension success using data on 75 line extensions of 34 cigarette brands over a 20-year period to investigate the relative effects of brand, extension, and firm characteristics on the incremental market share of brand line extensions. The econometric model...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
1994
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2987 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/3986/viewcontent/Reddy_ExtendExtendSuccess_1994.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-3986 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-39862024-08-01T00:46:40Z To extend or not to extend: Success determinants of brand line extensions REDDY, Srinivas K. HOLAK, Susan L. BHAT, Subodh The authors study the determinants of line extension success using data on 75 line extensions of 34 cigarette brands over a 20-year period to investigate the relative effects of brand, extension, and firm characteristics on the incremental market share of brand line extensions. The econometric model also captures the extent of cannibalization of parent brand sales that may have occurred due to the line extension's introduction. The authors also explore the role of a brand's symbolic value as a factor in line extension success. Results indicate that parent brand strength and its symbolic value, early entry timing, a firm's size, and distinctive marketing competencies, as well as the advertising support allocated to line extensions, contribute positively to the success of line extensions. Their findings suggest that, in this industry, cannibalization effects of line extension activity may have been limited and line extensions into earlier subcategories actually may have helped the parent brand. Even with cannibalization, the incremental sales generated by the extension seem to be reason enough to make a line extension strategy viable. 1994-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2987 info:doi/10.2307/3152197 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/3986/viewcontent/Reddy_ExtendExtendSuccess_1994.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Marketing Sales and Merchandising |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Marketing Sales and Merchandising |
spellingShingle |
Marketing Sales and Merchandising REDDY, Srinivas K. HOLAK, Susan L. BHAT, Subodh To extend or not to extend: Success determinants of brand line extensions |
description |
The authors study the determinants of line extension success using data on 75 line extensions of 34 cigarette brands over a 20-year period to investigate the relative effects of brand, extension, and firm characteristics on the incremental market share of brand line extensions. The econometric model also captures the extent of cannibalization of parent brand sales that may have occurred due to the line extension's introduction. The authors also explore the role of a brand's symbolic value as a factor in line extension success. Results indicate that parent brand strength and its symbolic value, early entry timing, a firm's size, and distinctive marketing competencies, as well as the advertising support allocated to line extensions, contribute positively to the success of line extensions. Their findings suggest that, in this industry, cannibalization effects of line extension activity may have been limited and line extensions into earlier subcategories actually may have helped the parent brand. Even with cannibalization, the incremental sales generated by the extension seem to be reason enough to make a line extension strategy viable. |
format |
text |
author |
REDDY, Srinivas K. HOLAK, Susan L. BHAT, Subodh |
author_facet |
REDDY, Srinivas K. HOLAK, Susan L. BHAT, Subodh |
author_sort |
REDDY, Srinivas K. |
title |
To extend or not to extend: Success determinants of brand line extensions |
title_short |
To extend or not to extend: Success determinants of brand line extensions |
title_full |
To extend or not to extend: Success determinants of brand line extensions |
title_fullStr |
To extend or not to extend: Success determinants of brand line extensions |
title_full_unstemmed |
To extend or not to extend: Success determinants of brand line extensions |
title_sort |
to extend or not to extend: success determinants of brand line extensions |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
1994 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2987 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/3986/viewcontent/Reddy_ExtendExtendSuccess_1994.pdf |
_version_ |
1814047710122082304 |