Step by step: The benefits of stage-based R&D licensing contracts
We examine how a licensor can optimally design licensing contracts for multi-phase R&D projects when he does not know the licensee’s project valuation, leading to adverse selection, and cannot enforce the licensee’s effort level, resulting in moral hazard. We focus on the effect of the phased na...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3228 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4227/viewcontent/Crama2013EJORStepbyStep_AFV.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-4227 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-42272021-08-30T04:25:57Z Step by step: The benefits of stage-based R&D licensing contracts Crama, Pascale DE REYCK, Bert Degraeve, Zeger We examine how a licensor can optimally design licensing contracts for multi-phase R&D projects when he does not know the licensee’s project valuation, leading to adverse selection, and cannot enforce the licensee’s effort level, resulting in moral hazard. We focus on the effect of the phased nature typical of such projects, and compare single-phase and multi-phase contracts. We determine the optimal values for the upfront payment, milestone payments and royalties, and the optimal timing for outlicensing. Including multiple milestones and accompanying payments can be an effective way of discriminating between licensees holding different valuations, without having to manipulate the royalty rate, which induces licensees to invest less, resulting in lower project values and socially suboptimal solutions. Interestingly, we also find that multiple milestone payments are beneficial even when the licensor is risk-averse, contrary to standard contract theory results, which recommend that only an upfront payment should be used. In terms of licensing timing, we show that the optimal time depends on the licensor’s risk aversion, the characteristics of the licensee and the project value. 2013-02-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3228 info:doi/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.09.014 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4227/viewcontent/Crama2013EJORStepbyStep_AFV.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Research and development Innovation Contract design Asymmetric information Industries Pharmaceutical Operations and Supply Chain Management Technology and Innovation |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Research and development Innovation Contract design Asymmetric information Industries Pharmaceutical Operations and Supply Chain Management Technology and Innovation |
spellingShingle |
Research and development Innovation Contract design Asymmetric information Industries Pharmaceutical Operations and Supply Chain Management Technology and Innovation Crama, Pascale DE REYCK, Bert Degraeve, Zeger Step by step: The benefits of stage-based R&D licensing contracts |
description |
We examine how a licensor can optimally design licensing contracts for multi-phase R&D projects when he does not know the licensee’s project valuation, leading to adverse selection, and cannot enforce the licensee’s effort level, resulting in moral hazard. We focus on the effect of the phased nature typical of such projects, and compare single-phase and multi-phase contracts. We determine the optimal values for the upfront payment, milestone payments and royalties, and the optimal timing for outlicensing. Including multiple milestones and accompanying payments can be an effective way of discriminating between licensees holding different valuations, without having to manipulate the royalty rate, which induces licensees to invest less, resulting in lower project values and socially suboptimal solutions. Interestingly, we also find that multiple milestone payments are beneficial even when the licensor is risk-averse, contrary to standard contract theory results, which recommend that only an upfront payment should be used. In terms of licensing timing, we show that the optimal time depends on the licensor’s risk aversion, the characteristics of the licensee and the project value. |
format |
text |
author |
Crama, Pascale DE REYCK, Bert Degraeve, Zeger |
author_facet |
Crama, Pascale DE REYCK, Bert Degraeve, Zeger |
author_sort |
Crama, Pascale |
title |
Step by step: The benefits of stage-based R&D licensing contracts |
title_short |
Step by step: The benefits of stage-based R&D licensing contracts |
title_full |
Step by step: The benefits of stage-based R&D licensing contracts |
title_fullStr |
Step by step: The benefits of stage-based R&D licensing contracts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Step by step: The benefits of stage-based R&D licensing contracts |
title_sort |
step by step: the benefits of stage-based r&d licensing contracts |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3228 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4227/viewcontent/Crama2013EJORStepbyStep_AFV.pdf |
_version_ |
1770571329512144896 |