Regret Salience and Accountability in the Decoy Effect
Two experiments examined the impact on the decoy effect of making salient the possibility of post-decision regret, a manipulation that has been shown in several earlier studies to stimulate critical examination and improvement of decision process. Experiment 1 (N = 62) showed that making regret sali...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3633 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4632/viewcontent/RebJ2013jdm12613a.pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4632/filename/0/type/additional/viewcontent/Reb2013SJDMdata1.csv https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4632/filename/1/type/additional/viewcontent/Reb2013SJDMdata2.csv |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-4632 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-46322018-07-04T06:41:41Z Regret Salience and Accountability in the Decoy Effect CONNOLLY, Terry Reb, Jochen KAUSEL, Edgar E. Two experiments examined the impact on the decoy effect of making salient the possibility of post-decision regret, a manipulation that has been shown in several earlier studies to stimulate critical examination and improvement of decision process. Experiment 1 (N = 62) showed that making regret salient eliminated the decoy effect in a personal preference task. Experiment 2 (N = 242) replicated this finding for a different personal preference task and for a prediction task. It also replicated previous findings that external accountability demands do not reduce, and may exacerbate, the decoy effect. We interpret both effects in terms of decision justification, with different justification standards operating for different audiences. The decoy effect, in this account, turns on accepting a weak justification, which may be seen as adequate for an external audience or one’s own inattentive self but inadequate under the more critical review triggered by making regret possibilities salient. Seeking justification to others (responding to accountability demands) thus maintains or exacerbates the decoy effect; seeking justification to oneself (responding to regret salience) reduces or eliminates it. The proposed mechanism provides a theoretical account both of the decoy effect itself and of how regret priming provides an effective debiasing procedure for it. 2013-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3633 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4632/viewcontent/RebJ2013jdm12613a.pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4632/filename/0/type/additional/viewcontent/Reb2013SJDMdata1.csv https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4632/filename/1/type/additional/viewcontent/Reb2013SJDMdata2.csv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University decision making anticipated regret decoy effect accountability justifiability regret salience regret priming Organizational Behavior and Theory |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
decision making anticipated regret decoy effect accountability justifiability regret salience regret priming Organizational Behavior and Theory |
spellingShingle |
decision making anticipated regret decoy effect accountability justifiability regret salience regret priming Organizational Behavior and Theory CONNOLLY, Terry Reb, Jochen KAUSEL, Edgar E. Regret Salience and Accountability in the Decoy Effect |
description |
Two experiments examined the impact on the decoy effect of making salient the possibility of post-decision regret, a manipulation that has been shown in several earlier studies to stimulate critical examination and improvement of decision process. Experiment 1 (N = 62) showed that making regret salient eliminated the decoy effect in a personal preference task. Experiment 2 (N = 242) replicated this finding for a different personal preference task and for a prediction task. It also replicated previous findings that external accountability demands do not reduce, and may exacerbate, the decoy effect. We interpret both effects in terms of decision justification, with different justification standards operating for different audiences. The decoy effect, in this account, turns on accepting a weak justification, which may be seen as adequate for an external audience or one’s own inattentive self but inadequate under the more critical review triggered by making regret possibilities salient. Seeking justification to others (responding to accountability demands) thus maintains or exacerbates the decoy effect; seeking justification to oneself (responding to regret salience) reduces or eliminates it. The proposed mechanism provides a theoretical account both of the decoy effect itself and of how regret priming provides an effective debiasing procedure for it. |
format |
text |
author |
CONNOLLY, Terry Reb, Jochen KAUSEL, Edgar E. |
author_facet |
CONNOLLY, Terry Reb, Jochen KAUSEL, Edgar E. |
author_sort |
CONNOLLY, Terry |
title |
Regret Salience and Accountability in the Decoy Effect |
title_short |
Regret Salience and Accountability in the Decoy Effect |
title_full |
Regret Salience and Accountability in the Decoy Effect |
title_fullStr |
Regret Salience and Accountability in the Decoy Effect |
title_full_unstemmed |
Regret Salience and Accountability in the Decoy Effect |
title_sort |
regret salience and accountability in the decoy effect |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3633 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4632/viewcontent/RebJ2013jdm12613a.pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4632/filename/0/type/additional/viewcontent/Reb2013SJDMdata1.csv https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4632/filename/1/type/additional/viewcontent/Reb2013SJDMdata2.csv |
_version_ |
1770571731830833152 |