Regret Salience and Accountability in the Decoy Effect

Two experiments examined the impact on the decoy effect of making salient the possibility of post-decision regret, a manipulation that has been shown in several earlier studies to stimulate critical examination and improvement of decision process. Experiment 1 (N = 62) showed that making regret sali...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: CONNOLLY, Terry, Reb, Jochen, KAUSEL, Edgar E.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3633
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4632/viewcontent/RebJ2013jdm12613a.pdf
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4632/filename/0/type/additional/viewcontent/Reb2013SJDMdata1.csv
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4632/filename/1/type/additional/viewcontent/Reb2013SJDMdata2.csv
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-4632
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-46322018-07-04T06:41:41Z Regret Salience and Accountability in the Decoy Effect CONNOLLY, Terry Reb, Jochen KAUSEL, Edgar E. Two experiments examined the impact on the decoy effect of making salient the possibility of post-decision regret, a manipulation that has been shown in several earlier studies to stimulate critical examination and improvement of decision process. Experiment 1 (N = 62) showed that making regret salient eliminated the decoy effect in a personal preference task. Experiment 2 (N = 242) replicated this finding for a different personal preference task and for a prediction task. It also replicated previous findings that external accountability demands do not reduce, and may exacerbate, the decoy effect. We interpret both effects in terms of decision justification, with different justification standards operating for different audiences. The decoy effect, in this account, turns on accepting a weak justification, which may be seen as adequate for an external audience or one’s own inattentive self but inadequate under the more critical review triggered by making regret possibilities salient. Seeking justification to others (responding to accountability demands) thus maintains or exacerbates the decoy effect; seeking justification to oneself (responding to regret salience) reduces or eliminates it. The proposed mechanism provides a theoretical account both of the decoy effect itself and of how regret priming provides an effective debiasing procedure for it. 2013-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3633 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4632/viewcontent/RebJ2013jdm12613a.pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4632/filename/0/type/additional/viewcontent/Reb2013SJDMdata1.csv https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4632/filename/1/type/additional/viewcontent/Reb2013SJDMdata2.csv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University decision making anticipated regret decoy effect accountability justifiability regret salience regret priming Organizational Behavior and Theory
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic decision making
anticipated regret
decoy effect
accountability
justifiability
regret salience
regret priming
Organizational Behavior and Theory
spellingShingle decision making
anticipated regret
decoy effect
accountability
justifiability
regret salience
regret priming
Organizational Behavior and Theory
CONNOLLY, Terry
Reb, Jochen
KAUSEL, Edgar E.
Regret Salience and Accountability in the Decoy Effect
description Two experiments examined the impact on the decoy effect of making salient the possibility of post-decision regret, a manipulation that has been shown in several earlier studies to stimulate critical examination and improvement of decision process. Experiment 1 (N = 62) showed that making regret salient eliminated the decoy effect in a personal preference task. Experiment 2 (N = 242) replicated this finding for a different personal preference task and for a prediction task. It also replicated previous findings that external accountability demands do not reduce, and may exacerbate, the decoy effect. We interpret both effects in terms of decision justification, with different justification standards operating for different audiences. The decoy effect, in this account, turns on accepting a weak justification, which may be seen as adequate for an external audience or one’s own inattentive self but inadequate under the more critical review triggered by making regret possibilities salient. Seeking justification to others (responding to accountability demands) thus maintains or exacerbates the decoy effect; seeking justification to oneself (responding to regret salience) reduces or eliminates it. The proposed mechanism provides a theoretical account both of the decoy effect itself and of how regret priming provides an effective debiasing procedure for it.
format text
author CONNOLLY, Terry
Reb, Jochen
KAUSEL, Edgar E.
author_facet CONNOLLY, Terry
Reb, Jochen
KAUSEL, Edgar E.
author_sort CONNOLLY, Terry
title Regret Salience and Accountability in the Decoy Effect
title_short Regret Salience and Accountability in the Decoy Effect
title_full Regret Salience and Accountability in the Decoy Effect
title_fullStr Regret Salience and Accountability in the Decoy Effect
title_full_unstemmed Regret Salience and Accountability in the Decoy Effect
title_sort regret salience and accountability in the decoy effect
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2013
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3633
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4632/viewcontent/RebJ2013jdm12613a.pdf
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4632/filename/0/type/additional/viewcontent/Reb2013SJDMdata1.csv
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4632/filename/1/type/additional/viewcontent/Reb2013SJDMdata2.csv
_version_ 1770571731830833152