A situational judgment test of personal initiative and its relationship with performance

Although situational judgment tests have been found to be valid predictors of performance, they have rarely been used to measure particular constructs. In this study, we apply the situational judgment test method to the measurement of personal initiative, a construct defined as situated action. We u...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: BLEDOW, Ronald Joachim, Frese, M.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3648
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-4647
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-46472014-02-04T11:37:58Z A situational judgment test of personal initiative and its relationship with performance BLEDOW, Ronald Joachim Frese, M. Although situational judgment tests have been found to be valid predictors of performance, they have rarely been used to measure particular constructs. In this study, we apply the situational judgment test method to the measurement of personal initiative, a construct defined as situated action. We used respondents' situated preferences in mental simulations of work scenarios as formative indicators of their overall level of personal initiative at work. Results from a validation study showed that the situational judgment test of personal initiative (SJT-PI) had adequate validity and complemented a Likert-type self-report measure of personal initiative in predicting behavioral criteria. Situated preferences for personal initiative were hypothesized to be proximal predictors of actual behavior and were accordingly found to mediate the relationship between generalized self-efficacy, felt responsibility, and actual behavior. Furthermore, situated preferences for personal initiative could be differentiated empirically from organizational citizenship behavior. We conclude that situational judgment tests are a promising method for measuring personal initiative and may be a general means of improving the validity of measurement in organizations. 2009-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3648 info:doi/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01137.x Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Organizational Behavior and Theory Psychology
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Organizational Behavior and Theory
Psychology
spellingShingle Organizational Behavior and Theory
Psychology
BLEDOW, Ronald Joachim
Frese, M.
A situational judgment test of personal initiative and its relationship with performance
description Although situational judgment tests have been found to be valid predictors of performance, they have rarely been used to measure particular constructs. In this study, we apply the situational judgment test method to the measurement of personal initiative, a construct defined as situated action. We used respondents' situated preferences in mental simulations of work scenarios as formative indicators of their overall level of personal initiative at work. Results from a validation study showed that the situational judgment test of personal initiative (SJT-PI) had adequate validity and complemented a Likert-type self-report measure of personal initiative in predicting behavioral criteria. Situated preferences for personal initiative were hypothesized to be proximal predictors of actual behavior and were accordingly found to mediate the relationship between generalized self-efficacy, felt responsibility, and actual behavior. Furthermore, situated preferences for personal initiative could be differentiated empirically from organizational citizenship behavior. We conclude that situational judgment tests are a promising method for measuring personal initiative and may be a general means of improving the validity of measurement in organizations.
format text
author BLEDOW, Ronald Joachim
Frese, M.
author_facet BLEDOW, Ronald Joachim
Frese, M.
author_sort BLEDOW, Ronald Joachim
title A situational judgment test of personal initiative and its relationship with performance
title_short A situational judgment test of personal initiative and its relationship with performance
title_full A situational judgment test of personal initiative and its relationship with performance
title_fullStr A situational judgment test of personal initiative and its relationship with performance
title_full_unstemmed A situational judgment test of personal initiative and its relationship with performance
title_sort situational judgment test of personal initiative and its relationship with performance
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2009
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3648
_version_ 1770571747804839936