Dynamic and risk measurement perspectives on bowman's risk-return paradox for strategic management: An empirical study
Bowman's (1980, 1982) widely quoted papers have reported the existence of a risk-return paradox for strategic management. In this paper the authors examine the dynamic behavior of the risk-return relationship and analyze whether the risk-return paradox is stable across time. The analysis involv...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Fiegenbaum, A, Thomas, Howard |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
1986
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3980 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Stakeholder Risks and the Bowman's Risk/Return Paradox: What Risk Measure is Relevant for Strategists?
by: FIEGENBAUM, Avi, et al.
Published: (1990) -
An Examination of the Structural Stability of Bowman's Risk Return Paradox
by: Fiegenbaum, Avi, et al.
Published: (1985) -
Attitudes and the risk-return paradox: Prospect theory explanations
by: Fiegenbaum, Avi, et al.
Published: (1988) -
Strategic Risk and Competitive Advantage: an integrative perspective
by: Fiegenbaum, A., et al.
Published: (2004) -
Risk Analysis Approaches in Strategic Management
by: Thomas, Howard, et al.
Published: (1983)