Institutional logics and power sources: Merger and acquisition decisions
Institutional theory has explained greater prevalence of many strategic actions by increases in their legitimacy over time, but has not developed theory on how firms decide between actions backed by competing institutional logics. We address this shortfall by applying theory of organizational coalit...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | GREVE, Henrich R., ZHANG, Cyndi Man |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4324 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/5323/viewcontent/Institutional_logics_power_sources_pv.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Dominant coalitions directing acquisitions: Different decision makers, different decisions
by: ZHANG, Cyndi Man, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Myopic reactions to performance feedback: Different decision makers, different decisions
by: GREVE, Henrich R., et al.
Published: (2016) -
Mergers and acquisitions as strategic decisions for a decision-making theory
by: ZHANG, Man
Published: (2020) -
Is there a strategic organization in the behavioral theory of the firm? Looking back and looking forward
by: GREVE, Henrich R., et al.
Published: (2022) -
Delayed adoption of rules: A relational theory of firm exposure and state cooptation
by: ZHANG, Cyndi Man, et al.
Published: (2018)