Pricing Information Goods: A Strategic Analysis of the Selling and Pay-per-Use Mechanisms
We analyze two pricing mechanisms for information goods. These mechanisms are selling, where up-front payment allows unrestricted use, and pay-per-use, where payments are tailored to use. We analytically model a market where consumers differ in use frequency and where use on a pay-per-use basis invo...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4918 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/5917/viewcontent/PricingInfoGoodsStrategic_2012_pp.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-5917 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-59172022-09-06T05:59:43Z Pricing Information Goods: A Strategic Analysis of the Selling and Pay-per-Use Mechanisms Balasubramanian, Sridhar BHATTACHARYA, Shantanu Krishnan, Vish V. We analyze two pricing mechanisms for information goods. These mechanisms are selling, where up-front payment allows unrestricted use, and pay-per-use, where payments are tailored to use. We analytically model a market where consumers differ in use frequency and where use on a pay-per-use basis invokes a psychological cost associated with the well known "ticking meter" effect. We demonstrate that pay-per-use yields higher profits in a monopoly provided the associated psychological cost is low. In a duopoly, one firm uses selling and the other uses pay-per-use. Here, in contrast to the monopoly, selling yields higher profits than pay-per-use. We demonstrate that, surprisingly, the profits of both duopolists can increase as the psychological cost associated with pay-per-use increases. Next, we show that uncertainty in consumer use frequency does not affect pay-per-use in a monopoly, but lowers profits from selling. In a duopoly, both the seller and the pay-peruse provider obtain lower profits when use frequency is uncertain. We also analyze how pricing mechanism performance is affected if the firms cannot commit to prices, if the pay-per-use provider offers a two-part tariff, and if consumers are risk-averse. 2015-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4918 info:doi/10.1287/mksc.2014.0894 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/5917/viewcontent/PricingInfoGoodsStrategic_2012_pp.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University information goods competitive strategy pricing digital marketing game theory Marketing Operations and Supply Chain Management |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
information goods competitive strategy pricing digital marketing game theory Marketing Operations and Supply Chain Management |
spellingShingle |
information goods competitive strategy pricing digital marketing game theory Marketing Operations and Supply Chain Management Balasubramanian, Sridhar BHATTACHARYA, Shantanu Krishnan, Vish V. Pricing Information Goods: A Strategic Analysis of the Selling and Pay-per-Use Mechanisms |
description |
We analyze two pricing mechanisms for information goods. These mechanisms are selling, where up-front payment allows unrestricted use, and pay-per-use, where payments are tailored to use. We analytically model a market where consumers differ in use frequency and where use on a pay-per-use basis invokes a psychological cost associated with the well known "ticking meter" effect. We demonstrate that pay-per-use yields higher profits in a monopoly provided the associated psychological cost is low. In a duopoly, one firm uses selling and the other uses pay-per-use. Here, in contrast to the monopoly, selling yields higher profits than pay-per-use. We demonstrate that, surprisingly, the profits of both duopolists can increase as the psychological cost associated with pay-per-use increases. Next, we show that uncertainty in consumer use frequency does not affect pay-per-use in a monopoly, but lowers profits from selling. In a duopoly, both the seller and the pay-peruse provider obtain lower profits when use frequency is uncertain. We also analyze how pricing mechanism performance is affected if the firms cannot commit to prices, if the pay-per-use provider offers a two-part tariff, and if consumers are risk-averse. |
format |
text |
author |
Balasubramanian, Sridhar BHATTACHARYA, Shantanu Krishnan, Vish V. |
author_facet |
Balasubramanian, Sridhar BHATTACHARYA, Shantanu Krishnan, Vish V. |
author_sort |
Balasubramanian, Sridhar |
title |
Pricing Information Goods: A Strategic Analysis of the Selling and Pay-per-Use Mechanisms |
title_short |
Pricing Information Goods: A Strategic Analysis of the Selling and Pay-per-Use Mechanisms |
title_full |
Pricing Information Goods: A Strategic Analysis of the Selling and Pay-per-Use Mechanisms |
title_fullStr |
Pricing Information Goods: A Strategic Analysis of the Selling and Pay-per-Use Mechanisms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pricing Information Goods: A Strategic Analysis of the Selling and Pay-per-Use Mechanisms |
title_sort |
pricing information goods: a strategic analysis of the selling and pay-per-use mechanisms |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4918 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/5917/viewcontent/PricingInfoGoodsStrategic_2012_pp.pdf |
_version_ |
1770572861544595456 |