Pricing Information Goods: A Strategic Analysis of the Selling and Pay-per-Use Mechanisms

We analyze two pricing mechanisms for information goods. These mechanisms are selling, where up-front payment allows unrestricted use, and pay-per-use, where payments are tailored to use. We analytically model a market where consumers differ in use frequency and where use on a pay-per-use basis invo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Balasubramanian, Sridhar, BHATTACHARYA, Shantanu, Krishnan, Vish V.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4918
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/5917/viewcontent/PricingInfoGoodsStrategic_2012_pp.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-5917
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-59172022-09-06T05:59:43Z Pricing Information Goods: A Strategic Analysis of the Selling and Pay-per-Use Mechanisms Balasubramanian, Sridhar BHATTACHARYA, Shantanu Krishnan, Vish V. We analyze two pricing mechanisms for information goods. These mechanisms are selling, where up-front payment allows unrestricted use, and pay-per-use, where payments are tailored to use. We analytically model a market where consumers differ in use frequency and where use on a pay-per-use basis invokes a psychological cost associated with the well known "ticking meter" effect. We demonstrate that pay-per-use yields higher profits in a monopoly provided the associated psychological cost is low. In a duopoly, one firm uses selling and the other uses pay-per-use. Here, in contrast to the monopoly, selling yields higher profits than pay-per-use. We demonstrate that, surprisingly, the profits of both duopolists can increase as the psychological cost associated with pay-per-use increases. Next, we show that uncertainty in consumer use frequency does not affect pay-per-use in a monopoly, but lowers profits from selling. In a duopoly, both the seller and the pay-peruse provider obtain lower profits when use frequency is uncertain. We also analyze how pricing mechanism performance is affected if the firms cannot commit to prices, if the pay-per-use provider offers a two-part tariff, and if consumers are risk-averse. 2015-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4918 info:doi/10.1287/mksc.2014.0894 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/5917/viewcontent/PricingInfoGoodsStrategic_2012_pp.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University information goods competitive strategy pricing digital marketing game theory Marketing Operations and Supply Chain Management
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic information goods
competitive strategy
pricing
digital marketing
game theory
Marketing
Operations and Supply Chain Management
spellingShingle information goods
competitive strategy
pricing
digital marketing
game theory
Marketing
Operations and Supply Chain Management
Balasubramanian, Sridhar
BHATTACHARYA, Shantanu
Krishnan, Vish V.
Pricing Information Goods: A Strategic Analysis of the Selling and Pay-per-Use Mechanisms
description We analyze two pricing mechanisms for information goods. These mechanisms are selling, where up-front payment allows unrestricted use, and pay-per-use, where payments are tailored to use. We analytically model a market where consumers differ in use frequency and where use on a pay-per-use basis invokes a psychological cost associated with the well known "ticking meter" effect. We demonstrate that pay-per-use yields higher profits in a monopoly provided the associated psychological cost is low. In a duopoly, one firm uses selling and the other uses pay-per-use. Here, in contrast to the monopoly, selling yields higher profits than pay-per-use. We demonstrate that, surprisingly, the profits of both duopolists can increase as the psychological cost associated with pay-per-use increases. Next, we show that uncertainty in consumer use frequency does not affect pay-per-use in a monopoly, but lowers profits from selling. In a duopoly, both the seller and the pay-peruse provider obtain lower profits when use frequency is uncertain. We also analyze how pricing mechanism performance is affected if the firms cannot commit to prices, if the pay-per-use provider offers a two-part tariff, and if consumers are risk-averse.
format text
author Balasubramanian, Sridhar
BHATTACHARYA, Shantanu
Krishnan, Vish V.
author_facet Balasubramanian, Sridhar
BHATTACHARYA, Shantanu
Krishnan, Vish V.
author_sort Balasubramanian, Sridhar
title Pricing Information Goods: A Strategic Analysis of the Selling and Pay-per-Use Mechanisms
title_short Pricing Information Goods: A Strategic Analysis of the Selling and Pay-per-Use Mechanisms
title_full Pricing Information Goods: A Strategic Analysis of the Selling and Pay-per-Use Mechanisms
title_fullStr Pricing Information Goods: A Strategic Analysis of the Selling and Pay-per-Use Mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed Pricing Information Goods: A Strategic Analysis of the Selling and Pay-per-Use Mechanisms
title_sort pricing information goods: a strategic analysis of the selling and pay-per-use mechanisms
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2015
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4918
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/5917/viewcontent/PricingInfoGoodsStrategic_2012_pp.pdf
_version_ 1770572861544595456