The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline
This crowdsourced project introduces a collaborative approach to improving the reproducibility of scientific research, in which findings are replicated in qualified independent laboratories before (rather than after) they are published. Our goal is to establish a non-adversarial replication process...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5159 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6158/viewcontent/Schweinsberg_et_al_JESP2016_the_pipeline_project__1_.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-6158 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-61582019-07-08T09:31:29Z The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline SCHWEINSBERG, Martin MADAN, Nikhil VIANELLO, Michelangelo SOMMER, S.Amy JORDAN, Jennifer al, et SCHAERER, Michael This crowdsourced project introduces a collaborative approach to improving the reproducibility of scientific research, in which findings are replicated in qualified independent laboratories before (rather than after) they are published. Our goal is to establish a non-adversarial replication process with highly informative final results. To illustrate the Pre-Publication Independent Replication (PPIR) approach, 25 research groups conducted replications of all ten moral judgment effects which the last author and his collaborators had “in the pipeline” as of August 2014. Six findings replicated according to all replication criteria, one finding replicated but with a significantly smaller effect size than the original, one finding replicated consistently in the original culture but not outside of it, and two findings failed to find support. In total, 40% of the original findings failed at least one major replication criterion. Potential ways to implement and incentivize pre-publication independent replication on a large scale are discussed. 2016-09-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5159 info:doi/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.001 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6158/viewcontent/Schweinsberg_et_al_JESP2016_the_pipeline_project__1_.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Crowdsourcing science Replication Reproducibility Research transparency Methodology Meta-science Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Crowdsourcing science Replication Reproducibility Research transparency Methodology Meta-science Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods |
spellingShingle |
Crowdsourcing science Replication Reproducibility Research transparency Methodology Meta-science Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods SCHWEINSBERG, Martin MADAN, Nikhil VIANELLO, Michelangelo SOMMER, S.Amy JORDAN, Jennifer al, et SCHAERER, Michael The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline |
description |
This crowdsourced project introduces a collaborative approach to improving the reproducibility of scientific research, in which findings are replicated in qualified independent laboratories before (rather than after) they are published. Our goal is to establish a non-adversarial replication process with highly informative final results. To illustrate the Pre-Publication Independent Replication (PPIR) approach, 25 research groups conducted replications of all ten moral judgment effects which the last author and his collaborators had “in the pipeline” as of August 2014. Six findings replicated according to all replication criteria, one finding replicated but with a significantly smaller effect size than the original, one finding replicated consistently in the original culture but not outside of it, and two findings failed to find support. In total, 40% of the original findings failed at least one major replication criterion. Potential ways to implement and incentivize pre-publication independent replication on a large scale are discussed. |
format |
text |
author |
SCHWEINSBERG, Martin MADAN, Nikhil VIANELLO, Michelangelo SOMMER, S.Amy JORDAN, Jennifer al, et SCHAERER, Michael |
author_facet |
SCHWEINSBERG, Martin MADAN, Nikhil VIANELLO, Michelangelo SOMMER, S.Amy JORDAN, Jennifer al, et SCHAERER, Michael |
author_sort |
SCHWEINSBERG, Martin |
title |
The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline |
title_short |
The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline |
title_full |
The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline |
title_fullStr |
The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline |
title_full_unstemmed |
The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline |
title_sort |
pipeline project: pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5159 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6158/viewcontent/Schweinsberg_et_al_JESP2016_the_pipeline_project__1_.pdf |
_version_ |
1770573594416381952 |