Investigating the uniqueness and usefulness of proactive personality in organizational research: A meta-analytic review
Using meta-analysis (283 effect sizes from 122 studies), we extend prior qualitative and quantitativereviews of research on proactive personality in a number of meaningful ways. First, we examine thediscriminant and incremental validity of proactive personality using meta-analytic regression analyse...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5451 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6450/viewcontent/HP_Proactive_Personality_Meta_Analysis.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-6450 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-64502019-08-30T06:26:21Z Investigating the uniqueness and usefulness of proactive personality in organizational research: A meta-analytic review SPITZMULLER, Matthias SIN, Hock-Peng HOWE, Michael FATIMAH, Shereen Using meta-analysis (283 effect sizes from 122 studies), we extend prior qualitative and quantitativereviews of research on proactive personality in a number of meaningful ways. First, we examine thediscriminant and incremental validity of proactive personality using meta-analytic regression analyses.Our results reveal that more than 50% of variance in proactive personality is unrelated to the BigFive personality traits collectively. Also, proactive personality accounts for unique variance in overalljob performance, task performance, and organizational citizenship behaviors, even after controllingfor the Big Five personality traits and general mental ability (for overall job performance and taskperformance). Moreover, we find no subgroup differences in proactive personality, highlighting itspotential use in selection contexts. In conclusion, we discuss implications of our findings for researchand practice. 2015-07-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5451 info:doi/10.1080/08959285.2015.1021041 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6450/viewcontent/HP_Proactive_Personality_Meta_Analysis.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Organizational Behavior and Theory Organizational Communication Organization Development |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Organizational Behavior and Theory Organizational Communication Organization Development |
spellingShingle |
Organizational Behavior and Theory Organizational Communication Organization Development SPITZMULLER, Matthias SIN, Hock-Peng HOWE, Michael FATIMAH, Shereen Investigating the uniqueness and usefulness of proactive personality in organizational research: A meta-analytic review |
description |
Using meta-analysis (283 effect sizes from 122 studies), we extend prior qualitative and quantitativereviews of research on proactive personality in a number of meaningful ways. First, we examine thediscriminant and incremental validity of proactive personality using meta-analytic regression analyses.Our results reveal that more than 50% of variance in proactive personality is unrelated to the BigFive personality traits collectively. Also, proactive personality accounts for unique variance in overalljob performance, task performance, and organizational citizenship behaviors, even after controllingfor the Big Five personality traits and general mental ability (for overall job performance and taskperformance). Moreover, we find no subgroup differences in proactive personality, highlighting itspotential use in selection contexts. In conclusion, we discuss implications of our findings for researchand practice. |
format |
text |
author |
SPITZMULLER, Matthias SIN, Hock-Peng HOWE, Michael FATIMAH, Shereen |
author_facet |
SPITZMULLER, Matthias SIN, Hock-Peng HOWE, Michael FATIMAH, Shereen |
author_sort |
SPITZMULLER, Matthias |
title |
Investigating the uniqueness and usefulness of proactive personality in organizational research: A meta-analytic review |
title_short |
Investigating the uniqueness and usefulness of proactive personality in organizational research: A meta-analytic review |
title_full |
Investigating the uniqueness and usefulness of proactive personality in organizational research: A meta-analytic review |
title_fullStr |
Investigating the uniqueness and usefulness of proactive personality in organizational research: A meta-analytic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Investigating the uniqueness and usefulness of proactive personality in organizational research: A meta-analytic review |
title_sort |
investigating the uniqueness and usefulness of proactive personality in organizational research: a meta-analytic review |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5451 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6450/viewcontent/HP_Proactive_Personality_Meta_Analysis.pdf |
_version_ |
1770573927404273664 |