Interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics in structured interviews

This study examines interviewers' sensitivity to impression management in structured interviews by determining the relative importance that interviewers attach to ( verbal and nonverbal) impression management as compared to the relative importance that they attach to predetermined competencies....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LIEVENS, Filip, PEETERS, Helga
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5684
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6683/viewcontent/sensitivity.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-6683
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-66832019-08-23T01:17:46Z Interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics in structured interviews LIEVENS, Filip PEETERS, Helga This study examines interviewers' sensitivity to impression management in structured interviews by determining the relative importance that interviewers attach to ( verbal and nonverbal) impression management as compared to the relative importance that they attach to predetermined competencies. Two samples of interviewers ( 55 Master I/O psychology students and 18 professional interviewers) watched and evaluated videotaped interviewees who were instructed to put their best foot forward. Results of relative weight analyses showed that the importance of verbal and nonverbal impression management tactics was relatively small as compared to the importance attached to job-related competencies. The type of interview format had some effect on interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics. In particular, in behavior description interviews the interviewers in both samples attached most relative weight to self-focused verbal tactics. Interviewer experience was not related to interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics. 2008-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5684 info:doi/10.1027/1015-5759.24.3.174 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6683/viewcontent/sensitivity.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Impression management tactics structured interviews behavior description interviews situational interviews bias Human Resources Management Organizational Behavior and Theory
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Impression management tactics
structured interviews
behavior description interviews
situational interviews
bias
Human Resources Management
Organizational Behavior and Theory
spellingShingle Impression management tactics
structured interviews
behavior description interviews
situational interviews
bias
Human Resources Management
Organizational Behavior and Theory
LIEVENS, Filip
PEETERS, Helga
Interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics in structured interviews
description This study examines interviewers' sensitivity to impression management in structured interviews by determining the relative importance that interviewers attach to ( verbal and nonverbal) impression management as compared to the relative importance that they attach to predetermined competencies. Two samples of interviewers ( 55 Master I/O psychology students and 18 professional interviewers) watched and evaluated videotaped interviewees who were instructed to put their best foot forward. Results of relative weight analyses showed that the importance of verbal and nonverbal impression management tactics was relatively small as compared to the importance attached to job-related competencies. The type of interview format had some effect on interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics. In particular, in behavior description interviews the interviewers in both samples attached most relative weight to self-focused verbal tactics. Interviewer experience was not related to interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics.
format text
author LIEVENS, Filip
PEETERS, Helga
author_facet LIEVENS, Filip
PEETERS, Helga
author_sort LIEVENS, Filip
title Interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics in structured interviews
title_short Interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics in structured interviews
title_full Interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics in structured interviews
title_fullStr Interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics in structured interviews
title_full_unstemmed Interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics in structured interviews
title_sort interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics in structured interviews
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2008
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5684
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6683/viewcontent/sensitivity.pdf
_version_ 1770574074265731072