Interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics in structured interviews
This study examines interviewers' sensitivity to impression management in structured interviews by determining the relative importance that interviewers attach to ( verbal and nonverbal) impression management as compared to the relative importance that they attach to predetermined competencies....
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2008
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5684 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6683/viewcontent/sensitivity.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-6683 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-66832019-08-23T01:17:46Z Interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics in structured interviews LIEVENS, Filip PEETERS, Helga This study examines interviewers' sensitivity to impression management in structured interviews by determining the relative importance that interviewers attach to ( verbal and nonverbal) impression management as compared to the relative importance that they attach to predetermined competencies. Two samples of interviewers ( 55 Master I/O psychology students and 18 professional interviewers) watched and evaluated videotaped interviewees who were instructed to put their best foot forward. Results of relative weight analyses showed that the importance of verbal and nonverbal impression management tactics was relatively small as compared to the importance attached to job-related competencies. The type of interview format had some effect on interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics. In particular, in behavior description interviews the interviewers in both samples attached most relative weight to self-focused verbal tactics. Interviewer experience was not related to interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics. 2008-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5684 info:doi/10.1027/1015-5759.24.3.174 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6683/viewcontent/sensitivity.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Impression management tactics structured interviews behavior description interviews situational interviews bias Human Resources Management Organizational Behavior and Theory |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Impression management tactics structured interviews behavior description interviews situational interviews bias Human Resources Management Organizational Behavior and Theory |
spellingShingle |
Impression management tactics structured interviews behavior description interviews situational interviews bias Human Resources Management Organizational Behavior and Theory LIEVENS, Filip PEETERS, Helga Interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics in structured interviews |
description |
This study examines interviewers' sensitivity to impression management in structured interviews by determining the relative importance that interviewers attach to ( verbal and nonverbal) impression management as compared to the relative importance that they attach to predetermined competencies. Two samples of interviewers ( 55 Master I/O psychology students and 18 professional interviewers) watched and evaluated videotaped interviewees who were instructed to put their best foot forward. Results of relative weight analyses showed that the importance of verbal and nonverbal impression management tactics was relatively small as compared to the importance attached to job-related competencies. The type of interview format had some effect on interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics. In particular, in behavior description interviews the interviewers in both samples attached most relative weight to self-focused verbal tactics. Interviewer experience was not related to interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics. |
format |
text |
author |
LIEVENS, Filip PEETERS, Helga |
author_facet |
LIEVENS, Filip PEETERS, Helga |
author_sort |
LIEVENS, Filip |
title |
Interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics in structured interviews |
title_short |
Interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics in structured interviews |
title_full |
Interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics in structured interviews |
title_fullStr |
Interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics in structured interviews |
title_full_unstemmed |
Interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics in structured interviews |
title_sort |
interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics in structured interviews |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2008 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5684 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6683/viewcontent/sensitivity.pdf |
_version_ |
1770574074265731072 |