Is saying “sorry” enough? Examining the effects of apology typologies by organization on consumer responses

• Main Authors: LWIN, May O., PANG, Augustine, LOH, Jun-Qi, PEH, Marilyn Hui-Ying, RODRIGUEZ, Sarah Ann, ZELANI, Nur Hanisah Binte
• Format: text
• Language: English
• Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2017
• Subjects: Advertising/public relations; Strategic communication; Experiment; Singapore; Others; Organizational Behavior and Theory; Organizational Communication
• Online Access: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5956; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6955/viewcontent/Is_saying_sorry_enough_apology_typologies_2016_av.pdf
• Institution: Singapore Management University

Apology has been found to be the most effective strategy in times of crises. However, there is a dearth of research on the kinds of apology used and how primary stakeholders, in particular consumers, received them. This study aims to examine consumer responses to the types of apologies offered post crises against the levels of attribution of responsibility. We also assess the potential mediating role of ethical concerns by developing the Perception-Behavioral Model of Crisis Response. An experiment was conducted to ascertain consumers’ impression of the organization post-apology. The results showed that the attribution of crisis responsibility significantly influences complaining, withholding and negative word-of-mouth behaviors. However, a very high degree of apology issued by the organization does not necessarily translate to reduced negative responses from consumers in light of the large attribution of responsibility. Finally, the Perception-Behavioral Model of Crisis Response suggests that ethical concerns can mediate negative behavioral intentions from consumers.