Integrating LMX components: How LMX components interactively influence justice and deviance

Leaders generally differentiate followers, for example, by providing some with more respect, trust, support, or information than others (Liden & Graen, 1980). This differential treatment is a fundamental tenet of leader-member exchange theory (LMX theory). However, the effects of leader differen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LIU, Yuchuan, GREGURAS, Gary John, CHINTAKANANDA, Kraivin
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6491
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-7490
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-74902020-01-16T09:24:03Z Integrating LMX components: How LMX components interactively influence justice and deviance LIU, Yuchuan GREGURAS, Gary John CHINTAKANANDA, Kraivin Leaders generally differentiate followers, for example, by providing some with more respect, trust, support, or information than others (Liden & Graen, 1980). This differential treatment is a fundamental tenet of leader-member exchange theory (LMX theory). However, the effects of leader differentiation on followers remain inconclusive such that LMX differentiation (LMXD) has negative, positive, or null effects on favorable employee work outcomes across studies (for a recent review, see Martin, Thomas, Legood, & Dello Russo, 2017). One potential reason for those inconclusive findings is that researchers did not consider that leader differentiation inevitably creates varying degrees of relationship quality across leader-follower dyads (LMX quality) and motivates social comparisons among followers as they assess their relative relationship quality with that of their coworkers (LMX social comparison or LMXSC). In this research, we incorporate these three components to theorize and investigate their interactive effects on followers’ supervisory interactional justice perceptions and subsequently on their supervisor-directed deviance. Results from an experiment and a field study support our theoretical model such that when LMX quality and LMXSC are both high, the negative impact of LMXD on followers’ supervisory interactional justice perceptions and its positive indirect effect on supervisor-directed deviance via justice is the weakest (zero). 2019-08-01T07:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6491 info:doi/10.5465/AMBPP.2019.13510abstract Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Human Resources Management Organizational Behavior and Theory
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Human Resources Management
Organizational Behavior and Theory
spellingShingle Human Resources Management
Organizational Behavior and Theory
LIU, Yuchuan
GREGURAS, Gary John
CHINTAKANANDA, Kraivin
Integrating LMX components: How LMX components interactively influence justice and deviance
description Leaders generally differentiate followers, for example, by providing some with more respect, trust, support, or information than others (Liden & Graen, 1980). This differential treatment is a fundamental tenet of leader-member exchange theory (LMX theory). However, the effects of leader differentiation on followers remain inconclusive such that LMX differentiation (LMXD) has negative, positive, or null effects on favorable employee work outcomes across studies (for a recent review, see Martin, Thomas, Legood, & Dello Russo, 2017). One potential reason for those inconclusive findings is that researchers did not consider that leader differentiation inevitably creates varying degrees of relationship quality across leader-follower dyads (LMX quality) and motivates social comparisons among followers as they assess their relative relationship quality with that of their coworkers (LMX social comparison or LMXSC). In this research, we incorporate these three components to theorize and investigate their interactive effects on followers’ supervisory interactional justice perceptions and subsequently on their supervisor-directed deviance. Results from an experiment and a field study support our theoretical model such that when LMX quality and LMXSC are both high, the negative impact of LMXD on followers’ supervisory interactional justice perceptions and its positive indirect effect on supervisor-directed deviance via justice is the weakest (zero).
format text
author LIU, Yuchuan
GREGURAS, Gary John
CHINTAKANANDA, Kraivin
author_facet LIU, Yuchuan
GREGURAS, Gary John
CHINTAKANANDA, Kraivin
author_sort LIU, Yuchuan
title Integrating LMX components: How LMX components interactively influence justice and deviance
title_short Integrating LMX components: How LMX components interactively influence justice and deviance
title_full Integrating LMX components: How LMX components interactively influence justice and deviance
title_fullStr Integrating LMX components: How LMX components interactively influence justice and deviance
title_full_unstemmed Integrating LMX components: How LMX components interactively influence justice and deviance
title_sort integrating lmx components: how lmx components interactively influence justice and deviance
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2019
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6491
_version_ 1770575049305096192