Inspire but don't interfere: Managerial influence as a double-edged sword for innovation

Managers play a pivotal role in the innovation process; yet, the mechanisms through which managers enhance or undermine innovation are not well understood. Drawing upon self-concordance theory, we argue that managers can augment employees' self-concordance—defined as the congruence of goals and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: GERPOTT, Fabiola, BLEDOW, Ronald, KUEHNEL, Jana
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6839
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7838/viewcontent/apps.12324.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-7838
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-78382022-04-14T06:02:41Z Inspire but don't interfere: Managerial influence as a double-edged sword for innovation GERPOTT, Fabiola BLEDOW, Ronald KUEHNEL, Jana Managers play a pivotal role in the innovation process; yet, the mechanisms through which managers enhance or undermine innovation are not well understood. Drawing upon self-concordance theory, we argue that managers can augment employees' self-concordance—defined as the congruence of goals and actions with inner values and preferences—through transformational behavior and thereby contribute to innovation. However, transformational behavior is closely coupled to another form of influence, namely, process management, the attempt to directly manage innovation-related activities. This form of managerial influence reduces employees' self-concordance and thereby undermines innovation. We test our conceptual model in a sample of 188 innovation projects using a contextualized method that asked employees to assess their self-concordance and their managers' behavior during each project. Managers evaluated for each project the innovativeness of the outcome. Multilevel path-analysis provided support for our hypotheses. We discuss future research implications to disentangle innovation-facilitating and innovation-undermining facets of managerial influence. 2021-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6839 info:doi/10.1111/apps.12324 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7838/viewcontent/apps.12324.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Innovation managers managerial influence Human Resources Management Organizational Behavior and Theory Technology and Innovation
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Innovation
managers
managerial influence
Human Resources Management
Organizational Behavior and Theory
Technology and Innovation
spellingShingle Innovation
managers
managerial influence
Human Resources Management
Organizational Behavior and Theory
Technology and Innovation
GERPOTT, Fabiola
BLEDOW, Ronald
KUEHNEL, Jana
Inspire but don't interfere: Managerial influence as a double-edged sword for innovation
description Managers play a pivotal role in the innovation process; yet, the mechanisms through which managers enhance or undermine innovation are not well understood. Drawing upon self-concordance theory, we argue that managers can augment employees' self-concordance—defined as the congruence of goals and actions with inner values and preferences—through transformational behavior and thereby contribute to innovation. However, transformational behavior is closely coupled to another form of influence, namely, process management, the attempt to directly manage innovation-related activities. This form of managerial influence reduces employees' self-concordance and thereby undermines innovation. We test our conceptual model in a sample of 188 innovation projects using a contextualized method that asked employees to assess their self-concordance and their managers' behavior during each project. Managers evaluated for each project the innovativeness of the outcome. Multilevel path-analysis provided support for our hypotheses. We discuss future research implications to disentangle innovation-facilitating and innovation-undermining facets of managerial influence.
format text
author GERPOTT, Fabiola
BLEDOW, Ronald
KUEHNEL, Jana
author_facet GERPOTT, Fabiola
BLEDOW, Ronald
KUEHNEL, Jana
author_sort GERPOTT, Fabiola
title Inspire but don't interfere: Managerial influence as a double-edged sword for innovation
title_short Inspire but don't interfere: Managerial influence as a double-edged sword for innovation
title_full Inspire but don't interfere: Managerial influence as a double-edged sword for innovation
title_fullStr Inspire but don't interfere: Managerial influence as a double-edged sword for innovation
title_full_unstemmed Inspire but don't interfere: Managerial influence as a double-edged sword for innovation
title_sort inspire but don't interfere: managerial influence as a double-edged sword for innovation
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2021
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6839
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7838/viewcontent/apps.12324.pdf
_version_ 1770575908866883584