Inspire but don't interfere: Managerial influence as a double-edged sword for innovation
Managers play a pivotal role in the innovation process; yet, the mechanisms through which managers enhance or undermine innovation are not well understood. Drawing upon self-concordance theory, we argue that managers can augment employees' self-concordance—defined as the congruence of goals and...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6839 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7838/viewcontent/apps.12324.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-7838 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-78382022-04-14T06:02:41Z Inspire but don't interfere: Managerial influence as a double-edged sword for innovation GERPOTT, Fabiola BLEDOW, Ronald KUEHNEL, Jana Managers play a pivotal role in the innovation process; yet, the mechanisms through which managers enhance or undermine innovation are not well understood. Drawing upon self-concordance theory, we argue that managers can augment employees' self-concordance—defined as the congruence of goals and actions with inner values and preferences—through transformational behavior and thereby contribute to innovation. However, transformational behavior is closely coupled to another form of influence, namely, process management, the attempt to directly manage innovation-related activities. This form of managerial influence reduces employees' self-concordance and thereby undermines innovation. We test our conceptual model in a sample of 188 innovation projects using a contextualized method that asked employees to assess their self-concordance and their managers' behavior during each project. Managers evaluated for each project the innovativeness of the outcome. Multilevel path-analysis provided support for our hypotheses. We discuss future research implications to disentangle innovation-facilitating and innovation-undermining facets of managerial influence. 2021-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6839 info:doi/10.1111/apps.12324 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7838/viewcontent/apps.12324.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Innovation managers managerial influence Human Resources Management Organizational Behavior and Theory Technology and Innovation |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Innovation managers managerial influence Human Resources Management Organizational Behavior and Theory Technology and Innovation |
spellingShingle |
Innovation managers managerial influence Human Resources Management Organizational Behavior and Theory Technology and Innovation GERPOTT, Fabiola BLEDOW, Ronald KUEHNEL, Jana Inspire but don't interfere: Managerial influence as a double-edged sword for innovation |
description |
Managers play a pivotal role in the innovation process; yet, the mechanisms through which managers enhance or undermine innovation are not well understood. Drawing upon self-concordance theory, we argue that managers can augment employees' self-concordance—defined as the congruence of goals and actions with inner values and preferences—through transformational behavior and thereby contribute to innovation. However, transformational behavior is closely coupled to another form of influence, namely, process management, the attempt to directly manage innovation-related activities. This form of managerial influence reduces employees' self-concordance and thereby undermines innovation. We test our conceptual model in a sample of 188 innovation projects using a contextualized method that asked employees to assess their self-concordance and their managers' behavior during each project. Managers evaluated for each project the innovativeness of the outcome. Multilevel path-analysis provided support for our hypotheses. We discuss future research implications to disentangle innovation-facilitating and innovation-undermining facets of managerial influence. |
format |
text |
author |
GERPOTT, Fabiola BLEDOW, Ronald KUEHNEL, Jana |
author_facet |
GERPOTT, Fabiola BLEDOW, Ronald KUEHNEL, Jana |
author_sort |
GERPOTT, Fabiola |
title |
Inspire but don't interfere: Managerial influence as a double-edged sword for innovation |
title_short |
Inspire but don't interfere: Managerial influence as a double-edged sword for innovation |
title_full |
Inspire but don't interfere: Managerial influence as a double-edged sword for innovation |
title_fullStr |
Inspire but don't interfere: Managerial influence as a double-edged sword for innovation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Inspire but don't interfere: Managerial influence as a double-edged sword for innovation |
title_sort |
inspire but don't interfere: managerial influence as a double-edged sword for innovation |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6839 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7838/viewcontent/apps.12324.pdf |
_version_ |
1770575908866883584 |