The breadth of normative standards: Antecedents and consequences for individuals and organizations
Normative standards refer to ideals to which people, products, and organizations are held. The present research (N = 2,224) investigates a novel construct—the breadth of normative standards, or the number of criteria that normative standards need to meet. Using archival and primary data in both orga...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7250 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8249/viewcontent/Madan_et_al_2022_AAM.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-8249 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-82492023-08-11T05:46:11Z The breadth of normative standards: Antecedents and consequences for individuals and organizations MADAN, Shilpa BASU, Shankha NG, Sharon SAVANI, Krishna Normative standards refer to ideals to which people, products, and organizations are held. The present research (N = 2,224) investigates a novel construct—the breadth of normative standards, or the number of criteria that normative standards need to meet. Using archival and primary data in both organizational and consumer contexts, Studies 1–2 found that Indians’ and Singaporeans’ normative standards in several domains (e.g., a good job, a good body wash) needed to satisfy more criteria than those of Americans and the British. Using incentive-compatible designs, Studies 3–5 identified two downstream consequences of broader normative standards; decision-makers with broader standards pay greater attention to detail when evaluating others’ work, and people with broader standards search for more options, even at a cost, before making a choice. This research complements past work on norms as prevalent behaviors, values, and attitudes by examining norms as standards, and documents consequences of the breadth of normative standards for employees and organizations. 2022-09-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7250 info:doi/10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104181 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8249/viewcontent/Madan_et_al_2022_AAM.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University normative standards criteria culture attention to detail maximizing Marketing Organizational Behavior and Theory |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
normative standards criteria culture attention to detail maximizing Marketing Organizational Behavior and Theory |
spellingShingle |
normative standards criteria culture attention to detail maximizing Marketing Organizational Behavior and Theory MADAN, Shilpa BASU, Shankha NG, Sharon SAVANI, Krishna The breadth of normative standards: Antecedents and consequences for individuals and organizations |
description |
Normative standards refer to ideals to which people, products, and organizations are held. The present research (N = 2,224) investigates a novel construct—the breadth of normative standards, or the number of criteria that normative standards need to meet. Using archival and primary data in both organizational and consumer contexts, Studies 1–2 found that Indians’ and Singaporeans’ normative standards in several domains (e.g., a good job, a good body wash) needed to satisfy more criteria than those of Americans and the British. Using incentive-compatible designs, Studies 3–5 identified two downstream consequences of broader normative standards; decision-makers with broader standards pay greater attention to detail when evaluating others’ work, and people with broader standards search for more options, even at a cost, before making a choice. This research complements past work on norms as prevalent behaviors, values, and attitudes by examining norms as standards, and documents consequences of the breadth of normative standards for employees and organizations. |
format |
text |
author |
MADAN, Shilpa BASU, Shankha NG, Sharon SAVANI, Krishna |
author_facet |
MADAN, Shilpa BASU, Shankha NG, Sharon SAVANI, Krishna |
author_sort |
MADAN, Shilpa |
title |
The breadth of normative standards: Antecedents and consequences for individuals and organizations |
title_short |
The breadth of normative standards: Antecedents and consequences for individuals and organizations |
title_full |
The breadth of normative standards: Antecedents and consequences for individuals and organizations |
title_fullStr |
The breadth of normative standards: Antecedents and consequences for individuals and organizations |
title_full_unstemmed |
The breadth of normative standards: Antecedents and consequences for individuals and organizations |
title_sort |
breadth of normative standards: antecedents and consequences for individuals and organizations |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7250 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8249/viewcontent/Madan_et_al_2022_AAM.pdf |
_version_ |
1779156837658001408 |