The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline.
This crowdsourced project introduces a collaborative approach to improving the reproducibility of scientific research, in which findings are replicated in qualified independent laboratories before (rather than after) they are published. Our goal is to establish a non-adversarial replication process...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7457 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8456/viewcontent/The_pipeline_project__Pre_publication_independent_replications_of_a_single_laboratory_s_research_pipeline.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-8456 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-84562024-02-08T08:27:05Z The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline. SCHWEINSBERG, Martin MADAN, Nikhil VIANELLO, Michelangelo SOMMER, S.Amy JORDAN, Jennifer et. al., This crowdsourced project introduces a collaborative approach to improving the reproducibility of scientific research, in which findings are replicated in qualified independent laboratories before (rather than after) they are published. Our goal is to establish a non-adversarial replication process with highly informative final results. To illustrate the Pre-Publication Independent Replication (PPIR) approach, 25 research groups conducted replications of all ten moral judgment effects which the last author and his collaborators had “in the pipeline” as of August 2014. Six findings replicated according to all replication criteria, one finding replicated but with a significantly smaller effect size than the original, one finding replicated consistently in the original culture but not outside of it, and two findings failed to find support. In total, 40% of the original findings failed at least one major replication criterion. Potential ways to implement and incentivize pre-publication independent replication on a large scale are discussed. 2016-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7457 info:doi/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.001 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8456/viewcontent/The_pipeline_project__Pre_publication_independent_replications_of_a_single_laboratory_s_research_pipeline.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Crowdsourcing science Replication Reproducibility Research transparency Methodology Meta-science Business |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Crowdsourcing science Replication Reproducibility Research transparency Methodology Meta-science Business |
spellingShingle |
Crowdsourcing science Replication Reproducibility Research transparency Methodology Meta-science Business SCHWEINSBERG, Martin MADAN, Nikhil VIANELLO, Michelangelo SOMMER, S.Amy JORDAN, Jennifer et. al., The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline. |
description |
This crowdsourced project introduces a collaborative approach to improving the reproducibility of scientific research, in which findings are replicated in qualified independent laboratories before (rather than after) they are published. Our goal is to establish a non-adversarial replication process with highly informative final results. To illustrate the Pre-Publication Independent Replication (PPIR) approach, 25 research groups conducted replications of all ten moral judgment effects which the last author and his collaborators had “in the pipeline” as of August 2014. Six findings replicated according to all replication criteria, one finding replicated but with a significantly smaller effect size than the original, one finding replicated consistently in the original culture but not outside of it, and two findings failed to find support. In total, 40% of the original findings failed at least one major replication criterion. Potential ways to implement and incentivize pre-publication independent replication on a large scale are discussed. |
format |
text |
author |
SCHWEINSBERG, Martin MADAN, Nikhil VIANELLO, Michelangelo SOMMER, S.Amy JORDAN, Jennifer et. al., |
author_facet |
SCHWEINSBERG, Martin MADAN, Nikhil VIANELLO, Michelangelo SOMMER, S.Amy JORDAN, Jennifer et. al., |
author_sort |
SCHWEINSBERG, Martin |
title |
The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline. |
title_short |
The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline. |
title_full |
The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline. |
title_fullStr |
The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline. |
title_sort |
pipeline project: pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline. |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7457 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8456/viewcontent/The_pipeline_project__Pre_publication_independent_replications_of_a_single_laboratory_s_research_pipeline.pdf |
_version_ |
1794549514035527680 |