Distribution Channel Structure for Competing Supply Chains with Price and Lead-Time Sensitive Demand
This paper studies distribution channel structure strategies (to centralize or decentralize) for two competing supply chains that sell substitutable products with price and lead-time sensitive demand. We find that centralization (decentralization) associates with itself a price (lead-time) advantage...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | text |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research_smu/86 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2158533 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Singapore Management University |
| Language: | English |
| Summary: | This paper studies distribution channel structure strategies (to centralize or decentralize) for two competing supply chains that sell substitutable products with price and lead-time sensitive demand. We find that centralization (decentralization) associates with itself a price (lead-time) advantage and a lead-time (price) disadvantage. As a result, price substitution and lead-time substitution have different impact on the equilibrium channel structure. Specifically, price substitution favors decentralization whereas lead-time substitution tends to result in centralization. Our results show that the equilibrium channel structure may critically depend on the game type (Bertrand vs. Cournot) and the pro t criterion (manufacturer pro t criterion vs. channel pro t criterion). In the Cournot model, centralization for both chains (CC) is always the only Nash equilibrium. In the Bertrand model, CC is still the only Nash equilibrium for the manufacturer pro t criterion. On the channel pro t criterion, however, the equilibrium channel structure changes with the relative intensity of price and lead-time substitution. |
|---|