Should We Collude? Analyzing the Benefits of Bidder Cooperation in Group-Buying Auctions

Cooperation among bidders in traditional auctions is typically forbidden. This is because it is viewed as being harmful to the interests of sellers, who hope to obtain fair prices for their sale items. It also may be harmful to other bidders who are not able to take advantage of any cooperation that...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: CHEN, J., CHEN, X., Kauffman, Robert J., SONG, X.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/2124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2008.11.010
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sis_research-3124
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sis_research-31242014-04-02T10:22:16Z Should We Collude? Analyzing the Benefits of Bidder Cooperation in Group-Buying Auctions CHEN, J. CHEN, X. Kauffman, Robert J. SONG, X. Cooperation among bidders in traditional auctions is typically forbidden. This is because it is viewed as being harmful to the interests of sellers, who hope to obtain fair prices for their sale items. It also may be harmful to other bidders who are not able to take advantage of any cooperation that is occurring. In online group-buying auctions, in contrast to traditional auctions, cooperation results in higher welfare, leading to market expansion that benefits buyers and sellers, as well as the auction intermediary. This has not been well understood in prior research, however. In this article, we show how the online group-buying auction mechanism on the Internet can be effectively enhanced to produce higher welfare for the participants. The key to achieving this, we find, is for the auction intermediary to provide a means for bidders to cooperate, so as to collectively express greater demand. Such cooperation, it turns out, permits the group-buying auction mechanism to dominate the fixed-price mechanism from the seller’s point of view under some circumstances. Through an analytical modeling analysis, we offer insights into how sellers can set their group-buying auction price curves more effectively, so as to take advantage of bidder cooperation to improve auction performance. We further argue that the goal of the auction intermediary should be to offer an information sharing mechanism to facilitate bidding ring formation, as a means to maximize the value of this market mechanism. 2009-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/2124 info:doi/10.1016/j.elerap.2008.11.010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2008.11.010 Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Analytical modeling Bidder cooperation Bidding rings Collusion Economic analysis Electronic markets Group-buying auctions Market mechanisms Mechanism design Online auctions Computer Sciences E-Commerce
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Analytical modeling
Bidder cooperation
Bidding rings
Collusion
Economic analysis
Electronic markets
Group-buying auctions
Market mechanisms
Mechanism design
Online auctions
Computer Sciences
E-Commerce
spellingShingle Analytical modeling
Bidder cooperation
Bidding rings
Collusion
Economic analysis
Electronic markets
Group-buying auctions
Market mechanisms
Mechanism design
Online auctions
Computer Sciences
E-Commerce
CHEN, J.
CHEN, X.
Kauffman, Robert J.
SONG, X.
Should We Collude? Analyzing the Benefits of Bidder Cooperation in Group-Buying Auctions
description Cooperation among bidders in traditional auctions is typically forbidden. This is because it is viewed as being harmful to the interests of sellers, who hope to obtain fair prices for their sale items. It also may be harmful to other bidders who are not able to take advantage of any cooperation that is occurring. In online group-buying auctions, in contrast to traditional auctions, cooperation results in higher welfare, leading to market expansion that benefits buyers and sellers, as well as the auction intermediary. This has not been well understood in prior research, however. In this article, we show how the online group-buying auction mechanism on the Internet can be effectively enhanced to produce higher welfare for the participants. The key to achieving this, we find, is for the auction intermediary to provide a means for bidders to cooperate, so as to collectively express greater demand. Such cooperation, it turns out, permits the group-buying auction mechanism to dominate the fixed-price mechanism from the seller’s point of view under some circumstances. Through an analytical modeling analysis, we offer insights into how sellers can set their group-buying auction price curves more effectively, so as to take advantage of bidder cooperation to improve auction performance. We further argue that the goal of the auction intermediary should be to offer an information sharing mechanism to facilitate bidding ring formation, as a means to maximize the value of this market mechanism.
format text
author CHEN, J.
CHEN, X.
Kauffman, Robert J.
SONG, X.
author_facet CHEN, J.
CHEN, X.
Kauffman, Robert J.
SONG, X.
author_sort CHEN, J.
title Should We Collude? Analyzing the Benefits of Bidder Cooperation in Group-Buying Auctions
title_short Should We Collude? Analyzing the Benefits of Bidder Cooperation in Group-Buying Auctions
title_full Should We Collude? Analyzing the Benefits of Bidder Cooperation in Group-Buying Auctions
title_fullStr Should We Collude? Analyzing the Benefits of Bidder Cooperation in Group-Buying Auctions
title_full_unstemmed Should We Collude? Analyzing the Benefits of Bidder Cooperation in Group-Buying Auctions
title_sort should we collude? analyzing the benefits of bidder cooperation in group-buying auctions
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2009
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/2124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2008.11.010
_version_ 1770571814623248384