A Public Procurement Combinatorial Auction Mechanism with Quality Assignment

This article focuses on mechanism design for quality assignment combinatorial procurement auctions. We model how the participants can maximize social surplus, the difference between gross utility and total cost in electronic procurement, while selecting appropriate quality standards for the procured...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: CHEN, J., Huang, H., Kauffman, Robert J.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/2180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.02.012
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sis_research-3180
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sis_research-31802014-04-02T10:22:16Z A Public Procurement Combinatorial Auction Mechanism with Quality Assignment CHEN, J. Huang, H. Kauffman, Robert J. This article focuses on mechanism design for quality assignment combinatorial procurement auctions. We model how the participants can maximize social surplus, the difference between gross utility and total cost in electronic procurement, while selecting appropriate quality standards for the procured items. In typical forward combinatorial auctions, the goal is to maximize the sum of all buyers' valuations. In our setting, however, to achieve high buyer utility with low supplier cost, the selected quality levels for the procured items from the suppliers must exceed some predetermined minimum threshold. So the identification of capable suppliers and the corresponding quality assignments are crucial, since buyer utility and supplier cost will be affected by the buyer's quality choice. We develop a novel mechanism to balance the interests of buyers and sellers. Our proposed quality assignment Vickrey–Groves–Clarke (QA-VCG) mechanism is incentive-compatible, provides constraints on partial participation, and is efficient in quasi-linear preferences. In consideration of the perspective of the buyer as a government auctioneer, we also propose a revised mechanism to implement the goal of achieving minimal procurement costs, and appropriate benefits for participating suppliers. We provide a numerical illustration of our QA-VCG mechanism, and an extension that addresses an iterative combinatorial auction mechanism design in our context. 2011-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/2180 info:doi/10.1016/j.dss.2011.02.012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.02.012 Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Combinatorial auctions Economic analysis Government procurement Mechanism design Quality assignment Social welfare Business Computer Sciences
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Combinatorial auctions
Economic analysis
Government procurement
Mechanism design
Quality assignment
Social welfare
Business
Computer Sciences
spellingShingle Combinatorial auctions
Economic analysis
Government procurement
Mechanism design
Quality assignment
Social welfare
Business
Computer Sciences
CHEN, J.
Huang, H.
Kauffman, Robert J.
A Public Procurement Combinatorial Auction Mechanism with Quality Assignment
description This article focuses on mechanism design for quality assignment combinatorial procurement auctions. We model how the participants can maximize social surplus, the difference between gross utility and total cost in electronic procurement, while selecting appropriate quality standards for the procured items. In typical forward combinatorial auctions, the goal is to maximize the sum of all buyers' valuations. In our setting, however, to achieve high buyer utility with low supplier cost, the selected quality levels for the procured items from the suppliers must exceed some predetermined minimum threshold. So the identification of capable suppliers and the corresponding quality assignments are crucial, since buyer utility and supplier cost will be affected by the buyer's quality choice. We develop a novel mechanism to balance the interests of buyers and sellers. Our proposed quality assignment Vickrey–Groves–Clarke (QA-VCG) mechanism is incentive-compatible, provides constraints on partial participation, and is efficient in quasi-linear preferences. In consideration of the perspective of the buyer as a government auctioneer, we also propose a revised mechanism to implement the goal of achieving minimal procurement costs, and appropriate benefits for participating suppliers. We provide a numerical illustration of our QA-VCG mechanism, and an extension that addresses an iterative combinatorial auction mechanism design in our context.
format text
author CHEN, J.
Huang, H.
Kauffman, Robert J.
author_facet CHEN, J.
Huang, H.
Kauffman, Robert J.
author_sort CHEN, J.
title A Public Procurement Combinatorial Auction Mechanism with Quality Assignment
title_short A Public Procurement Combinatorial Auction Mechanism with Quality Assignment
title_full A Public Procurement Combinatorial Auction Mechanism with Quality Assignment
title_fullStr A Public Procurement Combinatorial Auction Mechanism with Quality Assignment
title_full_unstemmed A Public Procurement Combinatorial Auction Mechanism with Quality Assignment
title_sort public procurement combinatorial auction mechanism with quality assignment
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2011
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/2180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.02.012
_version_ 1770571831823040512