Are US family firms subject to agency problems? Evidence from CEO turnover and firm valuation

This paper investigates the impact of the founding family's presence in US public firms on the extent of agency problems related to CEO turnover decisions and on firm valuations after poor performance. In particular, we focus on three types of US public firms: family CEO firms, professional CEO...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: CHEN, Xia, DAI, Zhonglan
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/865
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soa_research/article/1864/viewcontent/SSRN_id930824.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soa_research-1864
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soa_research-18642018-07-13T06:04:01Z Are US family firms subject to agency problems? Evidence from CEO turnover and firm valuation CHEN, Xia DAI, Zhonglan This paper investigates the impact of the founding family's presence in US public firms on the extent of agency problems related to CEO turnover decisions and on firm valuations after poor performance. In particular, we focus on three types of US public firms: family CEO firms, professional CEO family firms (family firms managed by a hired CEO outside the founding family), and non-family firms. We hypothesize that, the agency problem arising from the expropriation of small shareholders by large shareholders in family CEO firms and the agency problem arising from the separation of ownership and control in non-family firms, lead to a lower CEO turnover-performance sensitivity, compared to professional CEO family firms. Professional CEO family firms are subject to lesser agency problems due to the separation of family ownership and management as well as the founding family's effective monitoring of management. The empirical findings are consistent with our prediction. We further hypothesize and find that the more severe agency problems in both family CEO firms and non-family firms manifest themselves in lower firm value after poor performance, relative to professional CEO family firms. Overall, our results indicate that in the CEO turnover setting, family ownership, when separated from management, can mitigate agency problems as in professional CEO family firm, but when combined with management, can aggravate agency problems as in family CEO firms. 2007-09-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/865 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soa_research/article/1864/viewcontent/SSRN_id930824.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Accountancy eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Agency problems family firms CEO turnover firm valuation Accounting Corporate Finance Human Resources Management
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Agency problems
family firms
CEO turnover
firm valuation
Accounting
Corporate Finance
Human Resources Management
spellingShingle Agency problems
family firms
CEO turnover
firm valuation
Accounting
Corporate Finance
Human Resources Management
CHEN, Xia
DAI, Zhonglan
Are US family firms subject to agency problems? Evidence from CEO turnover and firm valuation
description This paper investigates the impact of the founding family's presence in US public firms on the extent of agency problems related to CEO turnover decisions and on firm valuations after poor performance. In particular, we focus on three types of US public firms: family CEO firms, professional CEO family firms (family firms managed by a hired CEO outside the founding family), and non-family firms. We hypothesize that, the agency problem arising from the expropriation of small shareholders by large shareholders in family CEO firms and the agency problem arising from the separation of ownership and control in non-family firms, lead to a lower CEO turnover-performance sensitivity, compared to professional CEO family firms. Professional CEO family firms are subject to lesser agency problems due to the separation of family ownership and management as well as the founding family's effective monitoring of management. The empirical findings are consistent with our prediction. We further hypothesize and find that the more severe agency problems in both family CEO firms and non-family firms manifest themselves in lower firm value after poor performance, relative to professional CEO family firms. Overall, our results indicate that in the CEO turnover setting, family ownership, when separated from management, can mitigate agency problems as in professional CEO family firm, but when combined with management, can aggravate agency problems as in family CEO firms.
format text
author CHEN, Xia
DAI, Zhonglan
author_facet CHEN, Xia
DAI, Zhonglan
author_sort CHEN, Xia
title Are US family firms subject to agency problems? Evidence from CEO turnover and firm valuation
title_short Are US family firms subject to agency problems? Evidence from CEO turnover and firm valuation
title_full Are US family firms subject to agency problems? Evidence from CEO turnover and firm valuation
title_fullStr Are US family firms subject to agency problems? Evidence from CEO turnover and firm valuation
title_full_unstemmed Are US family firms subject to agency problems? Evidence from CEO turnover and firm valuation
title_sort are us family firms subject to agency problems? evidence from ceo turnover and firm valuation
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2007
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/865
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soa_research/article/1864/viewcontent/SSRN_id930824.pdf
_version_ 1770571164986376192